3Commas vs Dynamic
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
3Commas Cloud-based trading automation platform with Hyperliquid bot support on Multi-Layer, while Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for 3Commas and Dynamic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
3Commas
Multi-LayerCloud-based trading automation platform with Hyperliquid bot support
3commas.io
Dynamic
Multi-LayerDeveloper-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding
dynamic.xyzOverview
3Commas
3Commas is a leading cloud-based crypto trading automation platform supporting Hyperliquid alongside 20+ major exchanges. Its user-friendly interface lets traders configure DCA bots, Grid bots, and Options bots without writing any code, bringing algorithmic trading accessibility to retail users. On Hyperliquid, 3Commas bots can execute DCA accumulation strategies, grid-trade perpetual futures, and manage portfolio rebalancing automatically. The platform's SmartTrade terminal provides advanced order types including trailing stop-loss, take-profit chains, and conditional orders that enhance Hyperliquid's native order types. With portfolio analytics, signal marketplace, and copy-trading features, 3Commas is a comprehensive automation ecosystem for traders who want institutional-grade strategy execution on Hyperliquid without deep technical knowledge. The platform's non-custodial model using API keys ensures users retain custody of funds while enabling automation.
Visit websiteDynamic
Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Wallets & Account Abstraction |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | 3commas.io | dynamic.xyz |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
3Commas is focused on trading bots & automation, while Dynamic targets wallets & account abstraction. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose 3Commas if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Cloud-based trading automation platform with Hyperliquid bot support
Choose Dynamic if you...
- ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding
Ecosystem Integration
3Commas
3Commas operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Dynamic
Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with 3Commas or Dynamic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category