PERP.WIKI

Across Protocol vs RedStone

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Bridges & Cross-Chain

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Across Protocol Intent-based cross-chain bridge — near-instant USDC bridging to Hyperliquid on Multi-Layer, while RedStone Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Across Protocol and RedStone. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Across Protocol logo

Across Protocol

Across Protocol is the leading intent-based cross-chain bridge, connecting over 15 chains — including Hyperliquid's HyperCore and HyperEVM — with near-instant settlement and some of the lowest fees in DeFi. Unlike traditional message-passing bridges, Across replaces step-by-step execution with user-declared outcomes called intents: users specify what they want, and a competitive network of relayers races to fulfill each transfer optimally. Backed by a three-layer architecture — a request-for-quote mechanism, a network of competitive relayers, and an on-chain settlement layer — Across guarantees fast fills averaging under one minute without sacrificing security or decentralization. Bridging 1 ETH costs under $1. The protocol has processed over $22B in cumulative volume across 15M+ transactions, making it one of the most proven interoperability solutions in production. For the Hyperliquid ecosystem, Across unlocks seamless capital inflows from Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and beyond — giving users and protocols a reliable, low-cost on-ramp to both HyperCore's order-book liquidity and HyperEVM's growing DeFi landscape.

Visit website
RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone is a modular blockchain oracle network that has become the dominant oracle solution on Hyperliquid, operating under the HyperStone brand for the ecosystem. Oracles are critical infrastructure — they provide smart contracts with real-world price feeds, enabling DeFi lending, derivatives, and synthetic assets to function correctly. RedStone's architecture is uniquely well-suited to Hyperliquid's high-performance environment: rather than pushing price updates to the chain on every tick (a costly approach), RedStone uses a pull-based model where data is fetched on-demand and cryptographically verified on-chain, dramatically reducing costs while maintaining freshness and accuracy. Securing approximately 99.5% of oracle-protected value on Hyperliquid, HyperStone feeds power a wide range of DeFi protocols on HyperEVM — from lending markets to perpetual protocols and yield vaults. RedStone aggregates price data from dozens of sources, applying outlier filtering and cryptographic attestation to ensure data integrity. With support for hundreds of assets and sub-second update latency, HyperStone gives Hyperliquid's DeFi ecosystem enterprise-grade price feeds, enabling complex financial products to be built with confidence in the underlying data infrastructure.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureAcross Protocol logoAcross ProtocolRedStone logoRedStone
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryBridges & Cross-ChainOracles
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year20222022
Websiteacross.toredstone.finance
Twitter@AcrossProtocol@redstone_defi
GitHubNot publicNot public
Verified✓ Verified✓ Verified
Tags
bridgeintent-basedUSDCfast
oracleHyperStoneprice-feedsHIP-3

Score Comparison

Across ProtocolRedStone
Open Source
Across Protocol
Not public
RedStone
Not public
Verified
Across Protocol
Verified
RedStone
Verified
Ecosystem Breadth
Across Protocol
4 tags
RedStone
4 tags
Maturity
Across Protocol
Since 2022
RedStone
Since 2022

Feature Matrix

FeatureAcross Protocol logoAcross ProtocolRedStone logoRedStone
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Across Protocol is focused on bridges & cross-chain, while RedStone targets oracles. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Unique Features

Across Protocol is distinguished by: bridge, intent-based, USDC, fast. RedStone stands out with: oracle, HyperStone, price-feeds, HIP-3.

When to Use Each

Choose Across Protocol if you...

  • Want a bridges & cross-chain solution on Multi-Layer
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like bridge and intent-based
  • Need: Intent-based cross-chain bridge — near-instant USDC bridging to Hyperliquid

Choose RedStone if you...

  • Want a oracles solution on Multi-Layer
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like oracle and HyperStone
  • Need: Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Across Protocol logo

Across Protocol

Across Protocol operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Across Protocol or RedStone to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons