PERP.WIKI

ASXN vs Tenderly

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data

Best for Research
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

ASXN Analytics dashboards for Hyperliquid — portfolio, vaults, revenue, and whale tracking on HyperCore, while Tenderly Smart contract debugging, monitoring, and simulation platform for HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for ASXN and Tenderly. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

ASXN logo

ASXN

ASXN is a professional-grade analytics platform dedicated to the Hyperliquid ecosystem, offering deep data tooling for traders, vault managers, and researchers who need more than surface-level metrics. The platform provides comprehensive portfolio PnL tracking with historical performance breakdowns, vault analytics that surface attribution and risk metrics for Hyperliquid's on-chain vaults, and broad market data covering perpetuals, spot markets, and HyperEVM protocol activity. ASXN fills a genuine gap for serious participants: block explorers show raw data, but ASXN interprets it — translating on-chain activity into actionable intelligence. Traders can analyze their own performance over time, identify patterns in their strategy execution, and benchmark against the broader market. Vault followers gain meaningful transparency into track records and risk profiles before committing capital. Market researchers can monitor ecosystem-wide trends including liquidity distribution, notable wallet flows, and protocol health indicators. Built specifically for Hyperliquid rather than adapted from a generic multi-chain analytics framework, ASXN understands the protocol's unique architecture — the interplay between L1 perpetuals and HyperEVM — and delivers insights that general-purpose platforms simply cannot replicate.

Visit website
Tenderly logo

Tenderly

Tenderly is the all-in-one smart contract development platform providing debugging, monitoring, simulation, and alerting tools for EVM developers building on HyperEVM and other networks. Its Visual Debugger decodes failed and reverted transactions into human-readable stack traces, making it dramatically faster to diagnose smart contract bugs compared to raw EVM opcodes. Tenderly's Simulation API lets developers test transaction outcomes against the current HyperEVM state without spending gas, enabling safer protocol upgrades and parameter changes. Continuous monitoring with configurable alerts notifies teams when specific on-chain conditions occur—such as large withdrawals, abnormal gas usage, or function calls from specific addresses. For Hyperliquid ecosystem teams shipping production DeFi protocols, Tenderly's toolchain shortens the development cycle and reduces the risk of costly on-chain mistakes, making it an essential part of any serious HyperEVM smart contract team's development workflow.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureASXN logoASXNTenderly logoTenderly
LayerHyperCoreMulti-Layer
CategoryAnalytics & DataSDKs & Developer Tools
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitehyperliquid.asxn.xyztenderly.co
Twitter@asxn_r
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
analyticsportfolioPnLdashboards

Score Comparison

ASXNTenderly
Open Source
ASXN
Not public
Tenderly
Not public
Verified
ASXN
Unverified
Tenderly
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
ASXN
4 tags
Tenderly
0 tags
Maturity
ASXN
Since 2025
Tenderly
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureASXN logoASXNTenderly logoTenderly
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

ASXN operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook), while Tenderly runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

ASXN is focused on analytics & data, while Tenderly targets sdks & developer tools. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose ASXN if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on HyperCore
  • Need features like analytics and portfolio
  • Need: Analytics dashboards for Hyperliquid — portfolio, vaults, revenue, and whale tracking

Choose Tenderly if you...

  • Want a sdks & developer tools solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Smart contract debugging, monitoring, and simulation platform for HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

ASXN logo

ASXN

ASXN operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.

Tenderly logo

Tenderly

Tenderly operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with ASXN or Tenderly to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons