Backed Finance vs Panoptic
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · RWA Perps
Best for TradersQuick Take
Backed Finance Swiss-regulated tokenized stocks and bonds for on-chain RWA exposure on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Panoptic Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Backed Finance and Panoptic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Backed Finance
Multi-LayerSwiss-regulated tokenized stocks and bonds for on-chain RWA exposure on HyperEVM
backedassets.fiPanoptic
Multi-LayerPerpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs
panoptic.xyzOverview
Backed Finance
Backed Finance is a Swiss-regulated issuer of on-chain tokens backed 1:1 by real-world financial assets including US Treasury bonds, equity ETFs, and individual company stocks. Backed's bTokens are fully transferable ERC-20 tokens that track the price of their underlying TradFi asset, enabling DeFi protocols on HyperEVM to offer exposure to traditional financial markets within their yield strategies and collateral frameworks. For Hyperliquid's RWA perps vision, Backed provides the underlying tokenized assets that power perpetual trading on real-world equities and bonds directly on-chain. Backed's regulatory compliance in Switzerland ensures that institutional participants can interact with these tokens in a legally compliant manner, bridging the gap between TradFi and the Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Its transparent reserve model and regular audits provide confidence for protocols that wish to use tokenized stocks as collateral or reference assets for derivatives.
Visit websitePanoptic
Panoptic is a groundbreaking perpetual options protocol built on Uniswap v3-style liquidity positions, enabling the permissionless creation and trading of any-strike, any-expiry options on any EVM token pair without the need for a traditional order book, options clearing house, or centralized counterparty. It represents one of the most technically sophisticated options primitives in DeFi, redefining how on-chain options are structured and priced. The protocol core insight is that Uniswap v3 concentrated liquidity positions are structurally equivalent to short-options payoff profiles. By reinterpreting and tokenizing these LP positions as options contracts, Panoptic enables traders to buy and sell calls and puts permissionlessly on any Uniswap v3 pool. Options sellers provide liquidity and collect streaming fees continuously, while options buyers pay a streaming premium instead of an upfront cost, eliminating the need for expiry dates and simplifying options mechanics for DeFi users. Panoptic supports multi-leg options strategies including spreads, straddles, strangles, and condors, all composable and expressible within a single transaction. This brings institutional-grade options strategy construction to DeFi for the first time in a fully on-chain, non-custodial format. On HyperEVM, where Uniswap v3-compatible concentrated liquidity DEXes are deploying, Panoptic enables sophisticated options trading on Hyperliquid spot assets. Options traders can express views on BTC, ETH, HYPE, and other assets with defined risk profiles, hedging perpetual positions or speculating on volatility surfaces. This complementary options layer adds significant depth to Hyperliquid existing perpetuals infrastructure. The protocol fee structure is directly linked to Uniswap v3 pool fee tiers of 0.05%, 0.30%, and 1.00%, and all pricing is derived from on-chain LP data, making Panoptic fully oracle-free and resistant to price manipulation. Liquidations are handled through a force-exercise mechanism that incentivizes third parties to close at-risk positions without centralized liquidators. Panoptic is targeted at experienced DeFi traders, options market makers, and quant funds seeking to build options books on-chain. Its gas-efficient design, deep Uniswap v3 integration, and novel streaming premium model make it one of the most technically innovative derivatives protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | RWA Perps | Decentralized Exchanges |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | backedassets.fi | panoptic.xyz |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Backed Finance is focused on rwa perps, while Panoptic targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Backed Finance if you...
- ✓Want a rwa perps solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Swiss-regulated tokenized stocks and bonds for on-chain RWA exposure on HyperEVM
Choose Panoptic if you...
- ✓Want a decentralized exchanges solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs
Ecosystem Integration
Backed Finance
Backed Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Panoptic
Panoptic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Backed Finance or Panoptic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category