PERP.WIKI

Chaos Labs vs HyperSwap

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data

Best for Research
Different Focus AreasVerified: HyperSwap

Quick Take

Chaos Labs DeFi risk analytics and parameter optimization for Hyperliquid ecosystem protocols on Multi-Layer, while HyperSwap First and largest native DEX on HyperEVM — ~$57M TVL on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Chaos Labs and HyperSwap. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Chaos Labs logo

Chaos Labs

Chaos Labs is a DeFi risk analytics and parameter optimization platform that uses agent-based simulations and quantitative modeling to help protocols manage risk and optimize capital efficiency. Working with major lending protocols, DEXes, and perpetuals markets including projects built on Hyperliquid, Chaos Labs provides data-driven recommendations for collateral factors, liquidation thresholds, and interest rate curves. Its economic security monitoring continuously stress-tests protocol parameters against simulated market scenarios including flash crashes and liquidity crises, alerting teams to potential vulnerabilities before they become exploits. For Hyperliquid ecosystem protocols handling significant TVL, Chaos Labs provides the rigorous quantitative framework necessary to safely scale while maintaining robust risk management. The platform's real-time dashboards give protocol teams and governance participants clear visibility into current risk exposure across all market conditions.

Visit website
HyperSwap logo

HyperSwap

HyperSwap is the first and most established native automated market maker (AMM) built on HyperEVM, Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible smart contract execution layer. Launched in early 2025 when HyperEVM went live, HyperSwap functions as the foundational liquidity hub of the HyperEVM ecosystem, providing the AMM infrastructure that powers swaps, LP incentives, and DeFi composability for the entire chain. Its token is traded under the ticker SWAP, with a token generation event (TGE) structured around a points accumulation campaign. HOW IT WORKS HyperSwap is architecturally a fork of Uniswap V2 and V3, adapted and deployed natively on HyperEVM. It runs two distinct pool types: a V2 implementation using the constant product (x*y=k) formula, where liquidity is spread uniformly across all price ranges, making it simple for passive LPs; and a V3 implementation that supports concentrated liquidity, allowing LPs to specify price ranges where their capital is actively deployed to earn a higher share of trading fees. Trades on HyperSwap execute directly against these liquidity pools via EVM smart contracts, with pricing determined algorithmically by pool ratios rather than an order book. Every swap incurs a fee that accrues to liquidity providers in proportion to their pool share. HyperSwap also runs an incentive layer via xHSPX (vote-escrowed SWAP), where users who lock SWAP tokens can direct liquidity mining emissions to specific pools, following a model pioneered by Curve Finance's veTokenomics. The protocol integrates with Thunderhead's liquid staking module, enabling users to stake HYPE directly through HyperSwap's interface in exchange for stHYPE, with HyperSwap-native incentives (HSPX) offered on top of staking yields. This creates a composable DeFi stack where users can simultaneously earn staking rewards, LP fees, and protocol emissions within one interface. KEY FEATURES - Dual AMM Architecture: V2 passive pools and V3 concentrated liquidity pools serve different LP risk profiles and strategies - Native HyperEVM Deployment: Built from the ground up on HyperEVM, providing chain-native speed and EVM compatibility without bridging or compatibility layers - veToken Incentive System: SWAP holders can lock tokens for xHSPX to direct liquidity emissions, aligning long-term liquidity with protocol governance - stHYPE Staking Integration: Partnership with Thunderhead allows users to stake HYPE and receive stHYPE through the HyperSwap interface, with additional HSPX point incentives - Points-Based Airdrop: A structured points program rewards swap volume and LP activity ahead of the SWAP token TGE TEAM AND BACKING HyperSwap was co-founded by CryptoPoulpe (known in French crypto communities as a prominent trader and KOL who was among the earliest public advocates for Hyperliquid in France) and Ryzed, an operator who left a traditional career to focus full-time on Hyperliquid development. The two met through crypto trading circles and were building HyperSwap while staying together in Bali during the HyperEVM beta phase, where they identified the need for a native AMM as the chain's first critical infrastructure gap. The broader HyperSwap team extends beyond the two founders. The project has reached a Strategic / Series A funding stage according to ecosystem trackers, implying institutional backing, though specific investors and round sizes have not been publicly confirmed. The team operates on Hyperliquid exclusively and has signaled no plans to deploy on other chains. TRACTION AND METRICS HyperSwap launched at the inception of HyperEVM in mid-February 2025 and quickly became the dominant on-chain AMM by liquidity. DefiLlama tracks HyperSwap's TVL, fees, and volume, confirming its status as one of the top protocols by TVL on HyperEVM. The protocol has active pools for major trading pairs including HYPE/USDC, HYPE/WETH, and HyperEVM token pairs launched through the ecosystem. HyperSwap's LP pools are consistently cited as primary liquidity sources by HyperEVM DEX aggregators including Gliquid, LiquidSwap, HyperBloom, and Laminar, confirming its position as the deepest native liquidity source on the chain. The SWAP token has an active secondary market, with the SWAP/WHYPE pair trading on HyperEVM. The points program has attracted significant user participation ahead of the TGE. HyperSwap is cited as one of the highest-traffic HyperEVM dApps, processing a substantial share of all HyperEVM swap volume. COMPETITIVE POSITION HyperSwap's primary competitors on HyperEVM are KittenSwap, Laminar, Hybra, ProjectX, and Valantis. KittenSwap is its most direct AMM rival, while Laminar competes as a liquidity engine with direct HyperCore order book access. HyperSwap's advantage is first-mover status and the deepest aggregate liquidity in the ecosystem, which creates a flywheel: more liquidity attracts more volume, generating more fees, which attracts more LPs. Against the broader DeFi AMM landscape, HyperSwap's Uniswap V2/V3 fork architecture is technically well-understood and battle-tested, reducing smart contract risk, but it does not offer architectural differentiation beyond the Hyperliquid chain context. The veToken model borrowed from Curve is proven but introduces complexity for retail users and creates governance competition dynamics. Its moat is therefore primarily chain-native advantage and liquidity network effects rather than protocol innovation. HYPERLIQUID INTEGRATION HyperSwap is a HyperEVM-native protocol that interfaces with Hyperliquid's chain at the execution layer. Users must transfer assets from HyperCore's spot or perp accounts to HyperEVM before interacting with HyperSwap. The protocol benefits from HyperEVM's sub-second block finality and low transaction costs, which make AMM swaps economically viable at smaller sizes than on chains like Ethereum mainnet. HyperSwap does not directly use HyperCore's order book or HIP-3 infrastructure, but its role as the primary HyperEVM liquidity layer means it is deeply integrated with the Hyperliquid ecosystem's overall composability. Every new token, protocol, or DeFi primitive launched on HyperEVM typically bootstraps initial liquidity through HyperSwap pools, cementing its position as DeFi infrastructure rather than a standalone application. RISKS AND CONSIDERATIONS HyperSwap's core risk is architectural commoditization — Uniswap V2/V3 forks are abundant across DeFi, and if a technically superior AMM (such as Gliquid's V4-based pools) attracts deeper liquidity, HyperSwap could lose its dominant position. The veToken system introduces centralization of governance power among large SWAP holders, which can direct emissions in ways that benefit insiders at the expense of protocol efficiency. Smart contract risk, while mitigated by using Uniswap's proven codebase, is present for HyperEVM-specific modifications and the Thunderhead integration module. The TGE timeline has not been officially disclosed, creating uncertainty for LP and airdrop participants who have allocated capital based on token reward expectations. If the TGE is delayed or the token economics are unfavorable, participation incentives may collapse rapidly. Finally, as a HyperEVM-only protocol, HyperSwap's success is entirely correlated with Hyperliquid ecosystem growth — a slowdown in HyperEVM adoption directly impacts the protocol's core metrics.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureChaos Labs logoChaos LabsHyperSwap logoHyperSwap
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryAnalytics & DataDecentralized Exchanges
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitechaoslabs.xyzapp.hyperswap.exchange
Twitter@HyperSwapX
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverified✓ Verified
Tags
DEXAMMxSWAPconcentrated-liquidity

Score Comparison

Chaos LabsHyperSwap
Open Source
Chaos Labs
Not public
HyperSwap
Not public
Verified
Chaos Labs
Unverified
HyperSwap
Verified
Ecosystem Breadth
Chaos Labs
0 tags
HyperSwap
4 tags
Maturity
Chaos Labs
Unknown
HyperSwap
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureChaos Labs logoChaos LabsHyperSwap logoHyperSwap
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Chaos Labs operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while HyperSwap runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Chaos Labs is focused on analytics & data, while HyperSwap targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Chaos Labs if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: DeFi risk analytics and parameter optimization for Hyperliquid ecosystem protocols

Choose HyperSwap if you...

  • Want a decentralized exchanges solution on HyperEVM
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like DEX and AMM
  • Need: First and largest native DEX on HyperEVM — ~$57M TVL

Ecosystem Integration

Chaos Labs logo

Chaos Labs

Chaos Labs operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

HyperSwap logo

HyperSwap

HyperSwap operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Chaos Labs or HyperSwap to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons