PERP.WIKI

Dune Analytics vs Mizu

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data

Best for Research
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Dune Analytics Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem on Multi-Layer, while Mizu Unified liquidity layer and yield aggregator for HyperEVM on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Dune Analytics and Mizu. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Dune Analytics logo

Dune Analytics

Dune Analytics is the leading community-powered blockchain data platform, where analysts write SQL queries against decoded on-chain data to build public dashboards—with a growing library of Hyperliquid-specific analytics. Hundreds of community-authored Dune dashboards track Hyperliquid metrics including total trading volume, open interest trends, liquidation waterfalls, fee revenue, top traders by P&L, and HLP vault performance. Dune's Spellbook framework enables reusable, cross-chain data models that standardize Hyperliquid data alongside Ethereum and Arbitrum metrics. For researchers, protocol teams, and investors, Dune provides free access to comprehensive Hyperliquid analytics without the need for custom indexing infrastructure. Its collaborative model means new Hyperliquid protocols can have community-built dashboards within days of launch, providing immediate transparency and accountability for the Hyperliquid ecosystem's growing DeFi activity.

Visit website
Mizu logo

Mizu

Mizu Labs is an automated yield aggregator protocol deployed on HyperEVM, Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible smart contract layer. Designed for ETH and BTC holders seeking to maximize returns within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, Mizu issues liquid wrapper tokens — hypeETH and hypeBTC — representing bridged assets that are continuously deployed across the highest-yielding HyperEVM protocols. Under the hood, Mizu automates liquidity routing into established platforms including HyperLend, HypurrFi, Felix, and Harmonix, compounding rewards and rebalancing positions without requiring manual intervention from depositors. This set-and-forget approach makes Mizu ideal for users who want exposure to HyperEVM's rich DeFi landscape — spanning lending markets, stablecoin minting, and structured yield products — without the overhead of active position management. By aggregating liquidity from many depositors, Mizu accesses yield opportunities at scale that would be inefficient for individual wallets. The protocol participates in points programs across its integrated protocols, passing accumulated rewards back to hypeETH and hypeBTC holders. As HyperEVM matures as a composable DeFi layer beneath Hyperliquid's core trading infrastructure, Mizu Labs positions itself as the primary yield optimization engine for bridged capital seeking productive, automated deployment.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureDune Analytics logoDune AnalyticsMizu logoMizu
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryAnalytics & DataYield & Vaults
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitedune.commizulabs.xyz
Twitter@mizulabs
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
yield-aggregatorvaultsmulti-assetBoringVault

Score Comparison

Dune AnalyticsMizu
Open Source
Dune Analytics
Not public
Mizu
Not public
Verified
Dune Analytics
Unverified
Mizu
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Dune Analytics
0 tags
Mizu
4 tags
Maturity
Dune Analytics
Unknown
Mizu
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureDune Analytics logoDune AnalyticsMizu logoMizu
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Dune Analytics operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Mizu runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Dune Analytics is focused on analytics & data, while Mizu targets yield & vaults. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Dune Analytics if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem

Choose Mizu if you...

  • Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like yield-aggregator and vaults
  • Need: Unified liquidity layer and yield aggregator for HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Dune Analytics logo

Dune Analytics

Dune Analytics operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Mizu logo

Mizu

Mizu operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Dune Analytics or Mizu to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons