Dune Analytics vs Mountain Protocol
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data
Best for ResearchQuick Take
Dune Analytics Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem on Multi-Layer, while Mountain Protocol USDM yield-bearing stablecoin passing US Treasury yields to Hyperliquid holders on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Dune Analytics and Mountain Protocol. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Dune Analytics
Multi-LayerCommunity-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem
dune.com
Mountain Protocol
Multi-LayerUSDM yield-bearing stablecoin passing US Treasury yields to Hyperliquid holders
mountainprotocol.comOverview
Dune Analytics
Dune Analytics is the leading community-powered blockchain data platform, where analysts write SQL queries against decoded on-chain data to build public dashboards—with a growing library of Hyperliquid-specific analytics. Hundreds of community-authored Dune dashboards track Hyperliquid metrics including total trading volume, open interest trends, liquidation waterfalls, fee revenue, top traders by P&L, and HLP vault performance. Dune's Spellbook framework enables reusable, cross-chain data models that standardize Hyperliquid data alongside Ethereum and Arbitrum metrics. For researchers, protocol teams, and investors, Dune provides free access to comprehensive Hyperliquid analytics without the need for custom indexing infrastructure. Its collaborative model means new Hyperliquid protocols can have community-built dashboards within days of launch, providing immediate transparency and accountability for the Hyperliquid ecosystem's growing DeFi activity.
Visit websiteMountain Protocol
Mountain Protocol is the issuer of USDM, a regulated, yield-bearing stablecoin backed by short-term US Treasury bills that automatically passes through Treasury yields to holders on a daily rebasing basis. Unlike traditional stablecoins that capture yield for issuers, USDM distributes approximately 4-5% APY directly to holders simply by holding the token—making it a compelling alternative to USDC and USDT in the HyperEVM ecosystem. As HyperEVM lending protocols and yield vaults integrate USDM as a base asset, Hyperliquid traders can earn real-world Treasury yields on their idle stablecoin balances between trades. Mountain Protocol operates under regulatory oversight and maintains full reserve attestations, providing institutional-grade compliance for DeFi protocols that need to satisfy regulatory requirements when deploying RWA-backed assets on Hyperliquid. USDM's daily rebasing model ensures yield accrues automatically without requiring any user action.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Analytics & Data | RWA Perps |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | dune.com | mountainprotocol.com |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Dune Analytics is focused on analytics & data, while Mountain Protocol targets rwa perps. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Dune Analytics if you...
- ✓Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem
Choose Mountain Protocol if you...
- ✓Want a rwa perps solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: USDM yield-bearing stablecoin passing US Treasury yields to Hyperliquid holders
Ecosystem Integration
Dune Analytics
Dune Analytics operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Mountain Protocol
Mountain Protocol operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Dune Analytics or Mountain Protocol to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category