PERP.WIKI

Dune Analytics vs Sentiment

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data

Best for Research
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Dune Analytics Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem on Multi-Layer, while Sentiment Leverage lending protocol on HyperEVM — perp positions as collateral on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Dune Analytics and Sentiment. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Dune Analytics logo

Dune Analytics

Dune Analytics is the leading community-powered blockchain data platform, where analysts write SQL queries against decoded on-chain data to build public dashboards—with a growing library of Hyperliquid-specific analytics. Hundreds of community-authored Dune dashboards track Hyperliquid metrics including total trading volume, open interest trends, liquidation waterfalls, fee revenue, top traders by P&L, and HLP vault performance. Dune's Spellbook framework enables reusable, cross-chain data models that standardize Hyperliquid data alongside Ethereum and Arbitrum metrics. For researchers, protocol teams, and investors, Dune provides free access to comprehensive Hyperliquid analytics without the need for custom indexing infrastructure. Its collaborative model means new Hyperliquid protocols can have community-built dashboards within days of launch, providing immediate transparency and accountability for the Hyperliquid ecosystem's growing DeFi activity.

Visit website
Sentiment logo

Sentiment

Sentiment is a next-generation DeFi lending protocol on HyperEVM, designed to give borrowers greater capital flexibility through isolated lending pools and an account-based credit architecture. Traditional lending protocols force users into rigid, overcollateralized positions with global risk parameters that constrain innovation and limit asset diversity. Sentiment breaks this mold by introducing isolated risk environments where each pool operates independently, containing risk exposure without preventing new markets from forming. Borrowers access credit across multiple asset types through a unified account abstraction layer, enabling sophisticated DeFi strategies like leveraged yield farming and cross-protocol composability. Lenders earn yield by supplying assets to pools that match their individual risk appetite. The isolated pool design means new assets can be listed and deprecated without systemic contagion — making Sentiment far more adaptive than monolithic lending markets. On HyperEVM, Sentiment benefits from Hyperliquid's high throughput and low transaction costs, enabling frequent position management that would be prohibitively expensive on mainnet Ethereum. As HyperEVM's DeFi ecosystem expands, Sentiment provides the critical credit infrastructure that traders and protocols depend on for efficient, flexible capital deployment.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureDune Analytics logoDune AnalyticsSentiment logoSentiment
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryAnalytics & DataLending & Borrowing
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitedune.comsentiment.xyz
Twitter@sentimentxyz
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
lendingisolated-poolsperp-collateral

Score Comparison

Dune AnalyticsSentiment
Open Source
Dune Analytics
Not public
Sentiment
Not public
Verified
Dune Analytics
Unverified
Sentiment
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Dune Analytics
0 tags
Sentiment
3 tags
Maturity
Dune Analytics
Unknown
Sentiment
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureDune Analytics logoDune AnalyticsSentiment logoSentiment
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Dune Analytics operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Sentiment runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Dune Analytics is focused on analytics & data, while Sentiment targets lending & borrowing. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Dune Analytics if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem

Choose Sentiment if you...

  • Want a lending & borrowing solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like lending and isolated-pools
  • Need: Leverage lending protocol on HyperEVM — perp positions as collateral

Ecosystem Integration

Dune Analytics logo

Dune Analytics

Dune Analytics operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Sentiment logo

Sentiment

Sentiment operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Dune Analytics or Sentiment to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons