PERP.WIKI

Dynamic vs Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Cross-Layer Alternatives

Quick Take

Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer, while Hyperliquid Names .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem on HyperEVM. Both compete in the wallets & account abstraction space but operate on different layers, which affects their capabilities and composability.

Based on public data for Dynamic and Hyperliquid Names. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.

Visit website
Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid Names
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionWallets & Account Abstraction
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitedynamic.xyzhlnames.xyz
Twitter@hlnames
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
domainsidentitynamingENS-style

Score Comparison

DynamicHyperliquid Names
Open Source
Dynamic
Not public
Hyperliquid Names
Not public
Verified
Dynamic
Unverified
Hyperliquid Names
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Dynamic
0 tags
Hyperliquid Names
4 tags
Maturity
Dynamic
Unknown
Hyperliquid Names
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid Names
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Hyperliquid Names runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

When to Use Each

Choose Dynamic if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding

Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like domains and identity
  • Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem

Ecosystem Integration

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Dynamic or Hyperliquid Names to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons