Euler Finance vs Insilico Terminal
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing
Best for BorrowersQuick Take
Euler Finance Modular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Insilico Terminal Free professional trading terminal — the first terminal on Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Euler Finance and Insilico Terminal. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Euler Finance
Multi-LayerModular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM
euler.financeInsilico Terminal
HyperCoreFree professional trading terminal — the first terminal on Hyperliquid
insilicoterminal.comOverview
Euler Finance
Euler Finance is a modular lending protocol built on the Ethereum Vault Connector (EVC), enabling permissionless creation of isolated lending markets with customizable risk parameters. Unlike monolithic lending protocols, Euler v2 allows any token to be listed in a vault with fine-grained control over collateral factors, interest rate models, and liquidation logic. As HyperEVM adoption grows, Euler's architecture is well-suited to support the long-tail of Hyperliquid spot tokens as borrowable and collateralizable assets. Its EVC enables complex vault interactions—like using yield-bearing positions as collateral—that unlock advanced DeFi strategies. Euler's emphasis on security, with multiple audits and a sophisticated risk framework, makes it a strong fit for protocols building sophisticated credit markets on Hyperliquid. The protocol returned stronger than ever after its v1 incident, with v2's modular design learned from that experience.
Visit websiteInsilico Terminal
Insilico Terminal is a free, professional-grade trading terminal and the first purpose-built execution interface to support Hyperliquid natively. Created by veteran trader Flood, the platform delivers institutional-quality order, position, and execution management tools to retail traders at zero cost — democratizing access to tooling previously reserved for professional trading desks. The terminal provides a comprehensive suite of advanced features: multi-order management, real-time position tracking across all open markets, granular execution controls, and a clean interface optimized for speed and clarity under fast market conditions. Unlike generic exchange UIs, Insilico Terminal is designed by a trader for traders — with a workflow that mirrors professional trading environments and prioritizes execution precision above all. Being the first terminal to integrate Hyperliquid natively means Insilico users benefit from direct access to Hyperliquid's high-performance on-chain order book, including sub-second execution, deep liquidity across 100+ perpetual markets, and transparent on-chain settlement. The platform also supports multi-chain trading, extending its utility for traders who operate across ecosystems. With no subscription fees and active community-driven development, Insilico Terminal has become an essential daily tool for serious traders in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperCore |
| Category | Lending & Borrowing | Trading Terminals & Interfaces |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2024 |
| Website | euler.finance | insilicoterminal.com |
| — | @InsilicoTrading | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | terminalTradingViewhotkeysprofessional |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Euler Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Insilico Terminal runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Euler Finance is focused on lending & borrowing, while Insilico Terminal targets trading terminals & interfaces. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Euler Finance if you...
- ✓Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Modular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM
Choose Insilico Terminal if you...
- ✓Want a trading terminals & interfaces solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like terminal and TradingView
- ✓Need: Free professional trading terminal — the first terminal on Hyperliquid
Ecosystem Integration
Euler Finance
Euler Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Insilico Terminal
Insilico Terminal operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Euler Finance or Insilico Terminal to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category