Euler Finance vs Katoshi
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing
Best for BorrowersQuick Take
Euler Finance Modular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Euler Finance and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Euler Finance
Multi-LayerModular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM
euler.financeKatoshi
HyperCoreAI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
katoshi.aiOverview
Euler Finance
Euler Finance is a modular lending protocol built on the Ethereum Vault Connector (EVC), enabling permissionless creation of isolated lending markets with customizable risk parameters. Unlike monolithic lending protocols, Euler v2 allows any token to be listed in a vault with fine-grained control over collateral factors, interest rate models, and liquidation logic. As HyperEVM adoption grows, Euler's architecture is well-suited to support the long-tail of Hyperliquid spot tokens as borrowable and collateralizable assets. Its EVC enables complex vault interactions—like using yield-bearing positions as collateral—that unlock advanced DeFi strategies. Euler's emphasis on security, with multiple audits and a sophisticated risk framework, makes it a strong fit for protocols building sophisticated credit markets on Hyperliquid. The protocol returned stronger than ever after its v1 incident, with v2's modular design learned from that experience.
Visit websiteKatoshi
Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperCore |
| Category | Lending & Borrowing | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | euler.finance | katoshi.ai |
| — | @KatoshiAI | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Euler Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Euler Finance is focused on lending & borrowing, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Euler Finance if you...
- ✓Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Modular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM
Choose Katoshi if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like AI and automation
- ✓Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
Ecosystem Integration
Euler Finance
Euler Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Katoshi
Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Euler Finance or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category