PERP.WIKI

Euler Finance vs Katoshi

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing

Best for Borrowers
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Euler Finance Modular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Euler Finance and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Euler Finance logo

Euler Finance

Euler Finance is a modular lending protocol built on the Ethereum Vault Connector (EVC), enabling permissionless creation of isolated lending markets with customizable risk parameters. Unlike monolithic lending protocols, Euler v2 allows any token to be listed in a vault with fine-grained control over collateral factors, interest rate models, and liquidation logic. As HyperEVM adoption grows, Euler's architecture is well-suited to support the long-tail of Hyperliquid spot tokens as borrowable and collateralizable assets. Its EVC enables complex vault interactions—like using yield-bearing positions as collateral—that unlock advanced DeFi strategies. Euler's emphasis on security, with multiple audits and a sophisticated risk framework, makes it a strong fit for protocols building sophisticated credit markets on Hyperliquid. The protocol returned stronger than ever after its v1 incident, with v2's modular design learned from that experience.

Visit website
Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureEuler Finance logoEuler FinanceKatoshi logoKatoshi
LayerMulti-LayerHyperCore
CategoryLending & BorrowingTrading Bots & Automation
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websiteeuler.financekatoshi.ai
Twitter@KatoshiAI
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial

Score Comparison

Euler FinanceKatoshi
Open Source
Euler Finance
Not public
Katoshi
Not public
Verified
Euler Finance
Unverified
Katoshi
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Euler Finance
0 tags
Katoshi
4 tags
Maturity
Euler Finance
Unknown
Katoshi
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureEuler Finance logoEuler FinanceKatoshi logoKatoshi
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Euler Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Euler Finance is focused on lending & borrowing, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Euler Finance if you...

  • Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Modular lending protocol with permissionless market creation on HyperEVM

Choose Katoshi if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
  • Need features like AI and automation
  • Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid

Ecosystem Integration

Euler Finance logo

Euler Finance

Euler Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Euler Finance or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons