Felix Protocol vs Gliquid
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing
Best for BorrowersQuick Take
Felix Protocol CDP lending protocol on HyperEVM — mint feUSD stablecoin on HyperEVM, while Gliquid V4 AMM DEX on HyperEVM — $170M+ trading volume on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Felix Protocol and Gliquid. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Felix Protocol
HyperEVMCDP lending protocol on HyperEVM — mint feUSD stablecoin
usefelix.xyzGliquid
HyperEVMV4 AMM DEX on HyperEVM — $170M+ trading volume
gliquid.xyzOverview
Felix Protocol
Felix Protocol is the primary stablecoin issuance and money market platform on Hyperliquid's HyperEVM, functioning as both a collateralized debt position (CDP) engine and a variable-rate lending marketplace. Built natively on HyperEVM, Felix has established itself as one of the largest DeFi protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem, having crossed $1 billion in total value locked in September 2025 before settling to approximately $440 million TVL by October 2025. The protocol's core thesis is that Hyperliquid's on-chain liquidity and composability create the ideal environment for a stablecoin primitive that earns real yield for its users rather than extracting value from them. WHAT IT IS Felix operates two distinct but complementary products: a CDP system that mints feUSD (a dollar-pegged synthetic stablecoin) against on-chain collateral, and Vanilla Markets, which are variable-rate lending pools for borrowing and earning yield against major assets. The protocol has also launched USDhl, a fiat-backed, T-bill-collateralized stablecoin powered by M0 (a wholesale dollar infrastructure), broadening Felix's stablecoin suite beyond purely algorithmic constructions. Together, these products position Felix as the stablecoin factory and lending backbone for the HyperEVM ecosystem. HOW IT WORKS The feUSD CDP system is built on a fork of Liquity v2's codebase, modified with additional risk controls suited to Hyperliquid's asset landscape. Users deposit accepted collateral — HYPE, wrapped BTC (UBTC), and liquid staking tokens like kHYPE — into Troves (individual CDP vaults) and mint feUSD against it at a conservative 40% loan-to-value ratio. This is notably lower than most DeFi lending platforms, a deliberate choice to limit systemic risk given the relative volatility of the collateral base. feUSD holders can redeem their tokens for $1 worth of underlying collateral at any time, and a Stability Pool absorbs liquidated positions, distributing collateral and earned interest to Stability Pool depositors. Interest rate selection is borrower-controlled, but positions with the lowest interest rates face first-redemption risk if feUSD depegs below $1 — a soft liquidation mechanism that enforces peg discipline. Vanilla Markets, the second pillar, are variable-rate lending pools built on Morpho's lending infrastructure. Lenders deposit stablecoins (USDhl, USDe, USDT0, USDH) and earn variable interest, while borrowers post collateral (HYPE, kHYPE, UBTC) to borrow. Interest rates adjust algorithmically with pool utilization, and liquidations execute automatically when a borrower's health factor falls below 1. All positions are over-collateralized. The July 2025 CoreWriter upgrade — which enables HyperEVM smart contracts to write data to HyperCore — means Felix can now route liquidations directly through HyperCore's orderbook rather than AMM pools, reducing slippage and creating tighter integration with Hyperliquid's core liquidity engine. USDhl, the third product, is a fiat-backed stablecoin issued via M0, a wholesale dollar infrastructure backed by T-bills with on-chain reserve attestations. Convertibility is enforced at 1:1 between M0 tokens and USD, and a maintained Uniswap v3 liquidity pool ensures low-friction arbitrage. The stablecoin distributes its 4%+ T-bill yield back to users as Hyperliquid incentives, split across HyperCore spot and HyperEVM liquidity pools and reweighted every two weeks. KEY FEATURES - Dual stablecoin architecture: feUSD (CDP, algorithmic peg via Liquity v2 mechanics) and USDhl (fiat-backed, M0-powered, yield-distributing) serve different user needs and risk profiles from a single platform. - Morpho-powered Vanilla Markets: Variable-rate lending pools with dynamic interest rates and automatic on-chain liquidations. Supports HYPE, kHYPE, UBTC as collateral against stablecoin borrowing. - CoreWriter liquidation integration: Since July 2025, Felix can programmatically send liquidation orders to HyperCore's orderbook, reducing slippage and execution risk during market stress. - Conservative risk parameters: 40% LTV cap on CDP positions, mint caps, admin-controlled pause mechanisms, and incremental collateral onboarding — reflecting a deliberate approach to risk management in a novel ecosystem. - Points and incentive program: An ongoing points program rewards users for minting feUSD, supplying to Vanilla Markets, and holding USDhl, creating strong growth incentives while the governance token remains unlaunched. TEAM AND BACKING Felix has operated without publicly naming its founding team, maintaining a degree of pseudonymity common in the Hyperliquid ecosystem. The project launched on HyperEVM shortly after the mainnet EVM became available in early 2025 and has not announced formal venture funding rounds as of the time of writing. The protocol operates under the usefelix.xyz domain and has an active development roadmap that includes "Chapter 2" — a planned expansion expected to unify incentive structures across HyperCore and HyperEVM and introduce new collateral types and evolved risk parameters. Community messaging has described Chapter 2 as a significant protocol upgrade aligned with full CoreWriter integration. Felix has maintained a partnership with Hyperion DeFi, a NASDAQ-listed company that has integrated with Felix's broader product suite. TRACTION AND METRICS Felix launched on HyperEVM in early 2025 and grew rapidly alongside the broader HyperEVM ecosystem. By June 2025, the protocol had crossed $100 million in outstanding loans — a milestone reported by The Defiant. September 2025 marked its all-time high with over $1 billion in TVL, as HyperEVM total TVL itself surged 350% in two months. As of October 2025, Felix held approximately $440 million in TVL, making it the second-largest native DeFi protocol on HyperEVM by this metric behind HyperLend. The protocol has accumulated significant volume through its Stability Pool mechanism and Vanilla Markets, with HYPE and UBTC serving as the primary collateral assets driving growth. An active points program has sustained user engagement and encouraged protocol experimentation. COMPETITIVE POSITION Within the HyperEVM ecosystem, Felix competes most directly with HyperLend for lending market share. Felix's differentiation lies in its CDP stablecoin product (feUSD), which HyperLend does not offer, and in the more conservative, risk-adjusted design of its collateral parameters. Versus Liquity on Ethereum, Felix inherits architectural inspiration but layers in pause mechanisms and admin controls that Liquity deliberately avoids — a trade-off between censorship resistance and pragmatic risk management. Against MakerDAO/Sky on Ethereum, Felix benefits from Hyperliquid's throughput and HyperCore composability. The USDhl product competes with Ethena's USDe and other yield-bearing stablecoins, but is differentiated by its M0 T-bill backing and distribution of real yield back to Hyperliquid participants rather than to protocol treasuries. HYPERLIQUID INTEGRATION Felix is architected exclusively for HyperEVM and deeply integrates with HyperCore at multiple levels. The feUSD CDP system accepts HYPE (HyperCore's native staking token) and kHYPE (Kinetiq's HyperCore-staked liquid staking token) as collateral — assets that are native to the Hyperliquid L1. The Vanilla Markets build on Morpho, which itself relies on HyperEVM's EVM execution. USDhl's yield distribution is routed through HyperCore spot market liquidity incentives. Critically, CoreWriter integration allows Felix to place liquidation orders directly on HyperCore's CLOB rather than routing through AMM pools — making Felix one of the first protocols to actively exploit the bidirectional HyperCore-HyperEVM bridge at a liquidation engine level. Felix's points program allocates rewards across both HyperCore spot and HyperEVM, incentivizing the dual-layer activity that is central to Hyperliquid's long-term design. RISKS AND CONSIDERATIONS The 40% LTV ratio provides a reasonable buffer against collateral volatility, but HYPE is the dominant collateral and is itself a relatively illiquid and volatile asset by traditional standards. A severe HYPE price shock could trigger cascading liquidations that test the Stability Pool's absorptive capacity and the CoreWriter liquidation pipeline. The feUSD peg mechanism's reliance on redemption pressure means that during market stress, borrowers with low interest rates face forced liquidation through redemption — a mechanism that is economically sound but can create adverse user experiences. The protocol's admin-controlled pause functionality and mint caps represent meaningful centralization versus Liquity's immutable design. Team pseudonymity creates limited accountability in the event of critical vulnerabilities or governance disputes. Governance token launch (not yet live as of the research period) introduces tokenomics uncertainty. Dependency on Morpho for Vanilla Markets means Felix inherits any bugs or risks from the Morpho lending infrastructure. Overall, Felix is well-designed for its environment but carries ecosystem concentration risk — its growth is tightly coupled to HYPE's price trajectory and HyperEVM's adoption curve.
Visit websiteGliquid
Gliquid is a next-generation decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator and automated market maker (AMM) built natively on HyperEVM, the EVM-compatible smart contract layer of the Hyperliquid blockchain. Positioned as the "Odos of HyperEVM," Gliquid combines intelligent liquidity routing across all major HyperEVM DEXes with its own proprietary V4 AMM pool architecture, offering users optimal swap pricing, minimal slippage, and hyper-efficient liquidity provision in a single integrated platform. HOW IT WORKS Gliquid operates on two interconnected layers. The aggregation layer scans available liquidity across HyperEVM's fragmented DEX landscape — including KittenSwap, HyperSwap, Laminar, Hybra, Valantis, and others — routing each swap through the most efficient path or splitting orders across multiple venues to minimize price impact. The second layer is Gliquid's own V4 AMM, which provides native liquidity pools built on an advanced concentrated liquidity architecture inspired by Uniswap V4's singleton and hook framework. This allows liquidity providers to deploy capital in targeted price ranges, increasing capital efficiency relative to legacy constant-product AMMs. The routing engine evaluates liquidity depth, gas costs, and real-time slippage across all integrated protocols simultaneously. Multi-hop routes and split order execution are computed in real-time and packaged into a single atomic transaction — meaning users receive best execution without multiple approvals or fragmented fills. Gliquid's V4 AMM pools serve as both a destination for routed trades and a standalone liquidity hub for new token launches and ecosystem pairs. KEY FEATURES - DEX Aggregation: Real-time smart routing across 10+ HyperEVM DEXes, aggregating fragmented liquidity into single-transaction optimal swaps - V4 AMM Architecture: Next-generation pool design supporting concentrated liquidity positions, hook-based customization, and composable pool logic - Points & Airdrop System: Gliquid has publicly confirmed an upcoming token airdrop, with a points accumulation system rewarding users for swap volume, liquidity provision, and consistent platform engagement - Capital Efficiency: V4 pool design allows liquidity providers to concentrate capital in active trading ranges, earning disproportionately higher fees relative to passive full-range deposits - Multi-DEX Integration: Functions as a routing layer consumed by other HyperEVM aggregators and applications, embedding Gliquid liquidity into the broader ecosystem TEAM AND BACKING Gliquid's team has operated with a degree of pseudonymity common to early-stage DeFi projects, with no public lead founder name confirmed at the time of writing. The project is independently developed and bootstrapped, with no publicly disclosed venture capital rounds or institutional backers. Community engagement occurs primarily through the project's Twitter/X presence and the official interface at gliquid.xyz. Given the confirmed airdrop and active protocol development, the team appears to be a small, focused group of experienced DeFi engineers. No formal funding disclosures have been made. TRACTION AND METRICS Gliquid launched in 2025 as part of the initial wave of HyperEVM protocols. Specific TVL and cumulative volume figures are not publicly disclosed in real-time dashboards as of this writing, but the protocol has achieved sufficient integration traction to be included in HyperBloom's DEX aggregator list alongside KittenSwap, HyperSwap, Laminar, Hybra, and others — indicating meaningful on-chain liquidity depth. The confirmed airdrop has driven significant organic user acquisition, as airdrop-eligible activity requires genuine interaction with the protocol's swap and liquidity provision features. In airdrops.io's September 2025 Hyperliquid ecosystem tier list, Gliquid was ranked B-tier, described as the leading DEX aggregator on HyperEVM with a confirmed airdrop — a notable distinction given the crowded competitive field of liquidity applications on the chain. COMPETITIVE POSITION Gliquid operates in the most competitive segment of the HyperEVM DeFi stack: DEX infrastructure. Its direct competitors are LiquidSwap (liqd.ag), HyperBloom, and Laminar, all of which offer aggregation services across overlapping DEX sources. Gliquid's differentiation lies in the combination of aggregation with its own native V4 AMM pools — meaning it simultaneously sources and generates liquidity. This dual-sided positioning is similar to the role 1inch plays on Ethereum by acting as both aggregator and liquidity provider. Against HyperSwap and KittenSwap, which are pure AMMs without aggregation, Gliquid competes for liquidity provider (LP) capital while also cannibalizing their volume flows through superior swap routing. The V4 architecture represents a technical leap over Uniswap V2 and V3 forks that dominate the current HyperEVM DEX landscape, potentially positioning Gliquid's pools as the preferred venue for sophisticated LPs. HYPERLIQUID INTEGRATION Gliquid is a HyperEVM-native protocol with no HyperCore presence. It interfaces with HyperEVM's EVM execution layer for all contract logic — AMM pool management, routing contracts, and fee distribution. Users bridge HYPE and other assets from HyperCore to HyperEVM to interact with Gliquid. The protocol is positioned to benefit significantly from Hyperliquid's HIP-3 upgrade, which is expected to accelerate HyperEVM adoption by driving broader ecosystem activity. Gliquid's role as an infrastructure aggregator means that any new DEX or token launched on HyperEVM becomes a potential routing source, expanding its addressable liquidity without requiring direct protocol changes. The confirmed airdrop also creates strong alignment between Gliquid's growth trajectory and broader HyperEVM ecosystem expansion metrics — the more users bridge to HyperEVM to farm the Hyperliquid ecosystem, the more volume flows through Gliquid's aggregator. RISKS AND CONSIDERATIONS Gliquid faces three primary risk vectors. First, the V4 AMM is technically ambitious — hooks and custom pool logic introduce smart contract complexity that must be thoroughly audited; any exploit or critical bug in the pool architecture could result in LP losses and permanent TVL damage. Second, the aggregation market on HyperEVM is crowded: LiquidSwap, HyperBloom, and Laminar all compete for the same routing volume, and Gliquid's dominance is not guaranteed. Third, the airdrop-driven user base presents retention risk — without a compelling post-TGE use case, activity may drop sharply after token distribution. The team's pseudonymity, while common in DeFi, means there is limited accountability in the event of a technical failure or strategic pivot. No formal audits have been publicly confirmed. Potential users should treat Gliquid's smart contracts as experimental until audits are published.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | HyperEVM | HyperEVM |
| Category | Lending & Borrowing | Decentralized Exchanges |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Website | usefelix.xyz | gliquid.xyz |
| @felixprotocol | @gliquidx | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | ✓ Verified | Unverified |
| Tags | lendingCDPfeUSDstablecoinLiquity-fork | DEXAMMV4concentrated-liquidity |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✓ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Felix Protocol is focused on lending & borrowing, while Gliquid targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Unique Features
Felix Protocol is distinguished by: lending, CDP, feUSD, stablecoin, Liquity-fork. Gliquid stands out with: DEX, AMM, V4, concentrated-liquidity.
Market Timing
Felix Protocol launched first in 2024, giving it a head start. Gliquid entered later in 2025, potentially with the benefit of learning from earlier entrants.
When to Use Each
Choose Felix Protocol if you...
- ✓Want a lending & borrowing solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
- ✓Need features like lending and CDP
- ✓Need: CDP lending protocol on HyperEVM — mint feUSD stablecoin
Choose Gliquid if you...
- ✓Want a decentralized exchanges solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Need features like DEX and AMM
- ✓Need: V4 AMM DEX on HyperEVM — $170M+ trading volume
Ecosystem Integration
Felix Protocol
Felix Protocol operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
Gliquid
Gliquid operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Felix Protocol or Gliquid to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category