PERP.WIKI

Felix Protocol vs HyperSwap

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing

Best for Borrowers
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Felix Protocol CDP lending protocol on HyperEVM — mint feUSD stablecoin on HyperEVM, while HyperSwap First and largest native DEX on HyperEVM — ~$57M TVL on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Felix Protocol and HyperSwap. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Felix Protocol logo

Felix Protocol

Felix Protocol is the primary stablecoin issuance and money market platform on Hyperliquid's HyperEVM, functioning as both a collateralized debt position (CDP) engine and a variable-rate lending marketplace. Built natively on HyperEVM, Felix has established itself as one of the largest DeFi protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem, having crossed $1 billion in total value locked in September 2025 before settling to approximately $440 million TVL by October 2025. The protocol's core thesis is that Hyperliquid's on-chain liquidity and composability create the ideal environment for a stablecoin primitive that earns real yield for its users rather than extracting value from them. WHAT IT IS Felix operates two distinct but complementary products: a CDP system that mints feUSD (a dollar-pegged synthetic stablecoin) against on-chain collateral, and Vanilla Markets, which are variable-rate lending pools for borrowing and earning yield against major assets. The protocol has also launched USDhl, a fiat-backed, T-bill-collateralized stablecoin powered by M0 (a wholesale dollar infrastructure), broadening Felix's stablecoin suite beyond purely algorithmic constructions. Together, these products position Felix as the stablecoin factory and lending backbone for the HyperEVM ecosystem. HOW IT WORKS The feUSD CDP system is built on a fork of Liquity v2's codebase, modified with additional risk controls suited to Hyperliquid's asset landscape. Users deposit accepted collateral — HYPE, wrapped BTC (UBTC), and liquid staking tokens like kHYPE — into Troves (individual CDP vaults) and mint feUSD against it at a conservative 40% loan-to-value ratio. This is notably lower than most DeFi lending platforms, a deliberate choice to limit systemic risk given the relative volatility of the collateral base. feUSD holders can redeem their tokens for $1 worth of underlying collateral at any time, and a Stability Pool absorbs liquidated positions, distributing collateral and earned interest to Stability Pool depositors. Interest rate selection is borrower-controlled, but positions with the lowest interest rates face first-redemption risk if feUSD depegs below $1 — a soft liquidation mechanism that enforces peg discipline. Vanilla Markets, the second pillar, are variable-rate lending pools built on Morpho's lending infrastructure. Lenders deposit stablecoins (USDhl, USDe, USDT0, USDH) and earn variable interest, while borrowers post collateral (HYPE, kHYPE, UBTC) to borrow. Interest rates adjust algorithmically with pool utilization, and liquidations execute automatically when a borrower's health factor falls below 1. All positions are over-collateralized. The July 2025 CoreWriter upgrade — which enables HyperEVM smart contracts to write data to HyperCore — means Felix can now route liquidations directly through HyperCore's orderbook rather than AMM pools, reducing slippage and creating tighter integration with Hyperliquid's core liquidity engine. USDhl, the third product, is a fiat-backed stablecoin issued via M0, a wholesale dollar infrastructure backed by T-bills with on-chain reserve attestations. Convertibility is enforced at 1:1 between M0 tokens and USD, and a maintained Uniswap v3 liquidity pool ensures low-friction arbitrage. The stablecoin distributes its 4%+ T-bill yield back to users as Hyperliquid incentives, split across HyperCore spot and HyperEVM liquidity pools and reweighted every two weeks. KEY FEATURES - Dual stablecoin architecture: feUSD (CDP, algorithmic peg via Liquity v2 mechanics) and USDhl (fiat-backed, M0-powered, yield-distributing) serve different user needs and risk profiles from a single platform. - Morpho-powered Vanilla Markets: Variable-rate lending pools with dynamic interest rates and automatic on-chain liquidations. Supports HYPE, kHYPE, UBTC as collateral against stablecoin borrowing. - CoreWriter liquidation integration: Since July 2025, Felix can programmatically send liquidation orders to HyperCore's orderbook, reducing slippage and execution risk during market stress. - Conservative risk parameters: 40% LTV cap on CDP positions, mint caps, admin-controlled pause mechanisms, and incremental collateral onboarding — reflecting a deliberate approach to risk management in a novel ecosystem. - Points and incentive program: An ongoing points program rewards users for minting feUSD, supplying to Vanilla Markets, and holding USDhl, creating strong growth incentives while the governance token remains unlaunched. TEAM AND BACKING Felix has operated without publicly naming its founding team, maintaining a degree of pseudonymity common in the Hyperliquid ecosystem. The project launched on HyperEVM shortly after the mainnet EVM became available in early 2025 and has not announced formal venture funding rounds as of the time of writing. The protocol operates under the usefelix.xyz domain and has an active development roadmap that includes "Chapter 2" — a planned expansion expected to unify incentive structures across HyperCore and HyperEVM and introduce new collateral types and evolved risk parameters. Community messaging has described Chapter 2 as a significant protocol upgrade aligned with full CoreWriter integration. Felix has maintained a partnership with Hyperion DeFi, a NASDAQ-listed company that has integrated with Felix's broader product suite. TRACTION AND METRICS Felix launched on HyperEVM in early 2025 and grew rapidly alongside the broader HyperEVM ecosystem. By June 2025, the protocol had crossed $100 million in outstanding loans — a milestone reported by The Defiant. September 2025 marked its all-time high with over $1 billion in TVL, as HyperEVM total TVL itself surged 350% in two months. As of October 2025, Felix held approximately $440 million in TVL, making it the second-largest native DeFi protocol on HyperEVM by this metric behind HyperLend. The protocol has accumulated significant volume through its Stability Pool mechanism and Vanilla Markets, with HYPE and UBTC serving as the primary collateral assets driving growth. An active points program has sustained user engagement and encouraged protocol experimentation. COMPETITIVE POSITION Within the HyperEVM ecosystem, Felix competes most directly with HyperLend for lending market share. Felix's differentiation lies in its CDP stablecoin product (feUSD), which HyperLend does not offer, and in the more conservative, risk-adjusted design of its collateral parameters. Versus Liquity on Ethereum, Felix inherits architectural inspiration but layers in pause mechanisms and admin controls that Liquity deliberately avoids — a trade-off between censorship resistance and pragmatic risk management. Against MakerDAO/Sky on Ethereum, Felix benefits from Hyperliquid's throughput and HyperCore composability. The USDhl product competes with Ethena's USDe and other yield-bearing stablecoins, but is differentiated by its M0 T-bill backing and distribution of real yield back to Hyperliquid participants rather than to protocol treasuries. HYPERLIQUID INTEGRATION Felix is architected exclusively for HyperEVM and deeply integrates with HyperCore at multiple levels. The feUSD CDP system accepts HYPE (HyperCore's native staking token) and kHYPE (Kinetiq's HyperCore-staked liquid staking token) as collateral — assets that are native to the Hyperliquid L1. The Vanilla Markets build on Morpho, which itself relies on HyperEVM's EVM execution. USDhl's yield distribution is routed through HyperCore spot market liquidity incentives. Critically, CoreWriter integration allows Felix to place liquidation orders directly on HyperCore's CLOB rather than routing through AMM pools — making Felix one of the first protocols to actively exploit the bidirectional HyperCore-HyperEVM bridge at a liquidation engine level. Felix's points program allocates rewards across both HyperCore spot and HyperEVM, incentivizing the dual-layer activity that is central to Hyperliquid's long-term design. RISKS AND CONSIDERATIONS The 40% LTV ratio provides a reasonable buffer against collateral volatility, but HYPE is the dominant collateral and is itself a relatively illiquid and volatile asset by traditional standards. A severe HYPE price shock could trigger cascading liquidations that test the Stability Pool's absorptive capacity and the CoreWriter liquidation pipeline. The feUSD peg mechanism's reliance on redemption pressure means that during market stress, borrowers with low interest rates face forced liquidation through redemption — a mechanism that is economically sound but can create adverse user experiences. The protocol's admin-controlled pause functionality and mint caps represent meaningful centralization versus Liquity's immutable design. Team pseudonymity creates limited accountability in the event of critical vulnerabilities or governance disputes. Governance token launch (not yet live as of the research period) introduces tokenomics uncertainty. Dependency on Morpho for Vanilla Markets means Felix inherits any bugs or risks from the Morpho lending infrastructure. Overall, Felix is well-designed for its environment but carries ecosystem concentration risk — its growth is tightly coupled to HYPE's price trajectory and HyperEVM's adoption curve.

Visit website
HyperSwap logo

HyperSwap

HyperSwap is the first and most established native automated market maker (AMM) built on HyperEVM, Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible smart contract execution layer. Launched in early 2025 when HyperEVM went live, HyperSwap functions as the foundational liquidity hub of the HyperEVM ecosystem, providing the AMM infrastructure that powers swaps, LP incentives, and DeFi composability for the entire chain. Its token is traded under the ticker SWAP, with a token generation event (TGE) structured around a points accumulation campaign. HOW IT WORKS HyperSwap is architecturally a fork of Uniswap V2 and V3, adapted and deployed natively on HyperEVM. It runs two distinct pool types: a V2 implementation using the constant product (x*y=k) formula, where liquidity is spread uniformly across all price ranges, making it simple for passive LPs; and a V3 implementation that supports concentrated liquidity, allowing LPs to specify price ranges where their capital is actively deployed to earn a higher share of trading fees. Trades on HyperSwap execute directly against these liquidity pools via EVM smart contracts, with pricing determined algorithmically by pool ratios rather than an order book. Every swap incurs a fee that accrues to liquidity providers in proportion to their pool share. HyperSwap also runs an incentive layer via xHSPX (vote-escrowed SWAP), where users who lock SWAP tokens can direct liquidity mining emissions to specific pools, following a model pioneered by Curve Finance's veTokenomics. The protocol integrates with Thunderhead's liquid staking module, enabling users to stake HYPE directly through HyperSwap's interface in exchange for stHYPE, with HyperSwap-native incentives (HSPX) offered on top of staking yields. This creates a composable DeFi stack where users can simultaneously earn staking rewards, LP fees, and protocol emissions within one interface. KEY FEATURES - Dual AMM Architecture: V2 passive pools and V3 concentrated liquidity pools serve different LP risk profiles and strategies - Native HyperEVM Deployment: Built from the ground up on HyperEVM, providing chain-native speed and EVM compatibility without bridging or compatibility layers - veToken Incentive System: SWAP holders can lock tokens for xHSPX to direct liquidity emissions, aligning long-term liquidity with protocol governance - stHYPE Staking Integration: Partnership with Thunderhead allows users to stake HYPE and receive stHYPE through the HyperSwap interface, with additional HSPX point incentives - Points-Based Airdrop: A structured points program rewards swap volume and LP activity ahead of the SWAP token TGE TEAM AND BACKING HyperSwap was co-founded by CryptoPoulpe (known in French crypto communities as a prominent trader and KOL who was among the earliest public advocates for Hyperliquid in France) and Ryzed, an operator who left a traditional career to focus full-time on Hyperliquid development. The two met through crypto trading circles and were building HyperSwap while staying together in Bali during the HyperEVM beta phase, where they identified the need for a native AMM as the chain's first critical infrastructure gap. The broader HyperSwap team extends beyond the two founders. The project has reached a Strategic / Series A funding stage according to ecosystem trackers, implying institutional backing, though specific investors and round sizes have not been publicly confirmed. The team operates on Hyperliquid exclusively and has signaled no plans to deploy on other chains. TRACTION AND METRICS HyperSwap launched at the inception of HyperEVM in mid-February 2025 and quickly became the dominant on-chain AMM by liquidity. DefiLlama tracks HyperSwap's TVL, fees, and volume, confirming its status as one of the top protocols by TVL on HyperEVM. The protocol has active pools for major trading pairs including HYPE/USDC, HYPE/WETH, and HyperEVM token pairs launched through the ecosystem. HyperSwap's LP pools are consistently cited as primary liquidity sources by HyperEVM DEX aggregators including Gliquid, LiquidSwap, HyperBloom, and Laminar, confirming its position as the deepest native liquidity source on the chain. The SWAP token has an active secondary market, with the SWAP/WHYPE pair trading on HyperEVM. The points program has attracted significant user participation ahead of the TGE. HyperSwap is cited as one of the highest-traffic HyperEVM dApps, processing a substantial share of all HyperEVM swap volume. COMPETITIVE POSITION HyperSwap's primary competitors on HyperEVM are KittenSwap, Laminar, Hybra, ProjectX, and Valantis. KittenSwap is its most direct AMM rival, while Laminar competes as a liquidity engine with direct HyperCore order book access. HyperSwap's advantage is first-mover status and the deepest aggregate liquidity in the ecosystem, which creates a flywheel: more liquidity attracts more volume, generating more fees, which attracts more LPs. Against the broader DeFi AMM landscape, HyperSwap's Uniswap V2/V3 fork architecture is technically well-understood and battle-tested, reducing smart contract risk, but it does not offer architectural differentiation beyond the Hyperliquid chain context. The veToken model borrowed from Curve is proven but introduces complexity for retail users and creates governance competition dynamics. Its moat is therefore primarily chain-native advantage and liquidity network effects rather than protocol innovation. HYPERLIQUID INTEGRATION HyperSwap is a HyperEVM-native protocol that interfaces with Hyperliquid's chain at the execution layer. Users must transfer assets from HyperCore's spot or perp accounts to HyperEVM before interacting with HyperSwap. The protocol benefits from HyperEVM's sub-second block finality and low transaction costs, which make AMM swaps economically viable at smaller sizes than on chains like Ethereum mainnet. HyperSwap does not directly use HyperCore's order book or HIP-3 infrastructure, but its role as the primary HyperEVM liquidity layer means it is deeply integrated with the Hyperliquid ecosystem's overall composability. Every new token, protocol, or DeFi primitive launched on HyperEVM typically bootstraps initial liquidity through HyperSwap pools, cementing its position as DeFi infrastructure rather than a standalone application. RISKS AND CONSIDERATIONS HyperSwap's core risk is architectural commoditization — Uniswap V2/V3 forks are abundant across DeFi, and if a technically superior AMM (such as Gliquid's V4-based pools) attracts deeper liquidity, HyperSwap could lose its dominant position. The veToken system introduces centralization of governance power among large SWAP holders, which can direct emissions in ways that benefit insiders at the expense of protocol efficiency. Smart contract risk, while mitigated by using Uniswap's proven codebase, is present for HyperEVM-specific modifications and the Thunderhead integration module. The TGE timeline has not been officially disclosed, creating uncertainty for LP and airdrop participants who have allocated capital based on token reward expectations. If the TGE is delayed or the token economics are unfavorable, participation incentives may collapse rapidly. Finally, as a HyperEVM-only protocol, HyperSwap's success is entirely correlated with Hyperliquid ecosystem growth — a slowdown in HyperEVM adoption directly impacts the protocol's core metrics.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureFelix Protocol logoFelix ProtocolHyperSwap logoHyperSwap
LayerHyperEVMHyperEVM
CategoryLending & BorrowingDecentralized Exchanges
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year20242025
Websiteusefelix.xyzapp.hyperswap.exchange
Twitter@felixprotocol@HyperSwapX
GitHubNot publicNot public
Verified✓ Verified✓ Verified
Tags
lendingCDPfeUSDstablecoinLiquity-fork
DEXAMMxSWAPconcentrated-liquidity

Score Comparison

Felix ProtocolHyperSwap
Open Source
Felix Protocol
Not public
HyperSwap
Not public
Verified
Felix Protocol
Verified
HyperSwap
Verified
Ecosystem Breadth
Felix Protocol
5 tags
HyperSwap
4 tags
Maturity
Felix Protocol
Since 2024
HyperSwap
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureFelix Protocol logoFelix ProtocolHyperSwap logoHyperSwap
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Felix Protocol is focused on lending & borrowing, while HyperSwap targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Unique Features

Felix Protocol is distinguished by: lending, CDP, feUSD, stablecoin, Liquity-fork. HyperSwap stands out with: DEX, AMM, xSWAP, concentrated-liquidity.

Market Timing

Felix Protocol launched first in 2024, giving it a head start. HyperSwap entered later in 2025, potentially with the benefit of learning from earlier entrants.

When to Use Each

Choose Felix Protocol if you...

  • Want a lending & borrowing solution on HyperEVM
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like lending and CDP
  • Need: CDP lending protocol on HyperEVM — mint feUSD stablecoin

Choose HyperSwap if you...

  • Want a decentralized exchanges solution on HyperEVM
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like DEX and AMM
  • Need: First and largest native DEX on HyperEVM — ~$57M TVL

Ecosystem Integration

Felix Protocol logo

Felix Protocol

Felix Protocol operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

HyperSwap logo

HyperSwap

HyperSwap operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Felix Protocol or HyperSwap to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons