PERP.WIKI

Gliquid vs Katoshi

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Decentralized Exchanges

Best for Swaps
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Gliquid V4 AMM DEX on HyperEVM — $170M+ trading volume on HyperEVM, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Gliquid and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Gliquid logo

Gliquid

Gliquid is a next-generation decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator and automated market maker (AMM) built natively on HyperEVM, the EVM-compatible smart contract layer of the Hyperliquid blockchain. Positioned as the "Odos of HyperEVM," Gliquid combines intelligent liquidity routing across all major HyperEVM DEXes with its own proprietary V4 AMM pool architecture, offering users optimal swap pricing, minimal slippage, and hyper-efficient liquidity provision in a single integrated platform. HOW IT WORKS Gliquid operates on two interconnected layers. The aggregation layer scans available liquidity across HyperEVM's fragmented DEX landscape — including KittenSwap, HyperSwap, Laminar, Hybra, Valantis, and others — routing each swap through the most efficient path or splitting orders across multiple venues to minimize price impact. The second layer is Gliquid's own V4 AMM, which provides native liquidity pools built on an advanced concentrated liquidity architecture inspired by Uniswap V4's singleton and hook framework. This allows liquidity providers to deploy capital in targeted price ranges, increasing capital efficiency relative to legacy constant-product AMMs. The routing engine evaluates liquidity depth, gas costs, and real-time slippage across all integrated protocols simultaneously. Multi-hop routes and split order execution are computed in real-time and packaged into a single atomic transaction — meaning users receive best execution without multiple approvals or fragmented fills. Gliquid's V4 AMM pools serve as both a destination for routed trades and a standalone liquidity hub for new token launches and ecosystem pairs. KEY FEATURES - DEX Aggregation: Real-time smart routing across 10+ HyperEVM DEXes, aggregating fragmented liquidity into single-transaction optimal swaps - V4 AMM Architecture: Next-generation pool design supporting concentrated liquidity positions, hook-based customization, and composable pool logic - Points & Airdrop System: Gliquid has publicly confirmed an upcoming token airdrop, with a points accumulation system rewarding users for swap volume, liquidity provision, and consistent platform engagement - Capital Efficiency: V4 pool design allows liquidity providers to concentrate capital in active trading ranges, earning disproportionately higher fees relative to passive full-range deposits - Multi-DEX Integration: Functions as a routing layer consumed by other HyperEVM aggregators and applications, embedding Gliquid liquidity into the broader ecosystem TEAM AND BACKING Gliquid's team has operated with a degree of pseudonymity common to early-stage DeFi projects, with no public lead founder name confirmed at the time of writing. The project is independently developed and bootstrapped, with no publicly disclosed venture capital rounds or institutional backers. Community engagement occurs primarily through the project's Twitter/X presence and the official interface at gliquid.xyz. Given the confirmed airdrop and active protocol development, the team appears to be a small, focused group of experienced DeFi engineers. No formal funding disclosures have been made. TRACTION AND METRICS Gliquid launched in 2025 as part of the initial wave of HyperEVM protocols. Specific TVL and cumulative volume figures are not publicly disclosed in real-time dashboards as of this writing, but the protocol has achieved sufficient integration traction to be included in HyperBloom's DEX aggregator list alongside KittenSwap, HyperSwap, Laminar, Hybra, and others — indicating meaningful on-chain liquidity depth. The confirmed airdrop has driven significant organic user acquisition, as airdrop-eligible activity requires genuine interaction with the protocol's swap and liquidity provision features. In airdrops.io's September 2025 Hyperliquid ecosystem tier list, Gliquid was ranked B-tier, described as the leading DEX aggregator on HyperEVM with a confirmed airdrop — a notable distinction given the crowded competitive field of liquidity applications on the chain. COMPETITIVE POSITION Gliquid operates in the most competitive segment of the HyperEVM DeFi stack: DEX infrastructure. Its direct competitors are LiquidSwap (liqd.ag), HyperBloom, and Laminar, all of which offer aggregation services across overlapping DEX sources. Gliquid's differentiation lies in the combination of aggregation with its own native V4 AMM pools — meaning it simultaneously sources and generates liquidity. This dual-sided positioning is similar to the role 1inch plays on Ethereum by acting as both aggregator and liquidity provider. Against HyperSwap and KittenSwap, which are pure AMMs without aggregation, Gliquid competes for liquidity provider (LP) capital while also cannibalizing their volume flows through superior swap routing. The V4 architecture represents a technical leap over Uniswap V2 and V3 forks that dominate the current HyperEVM DEX landscape, potentially positioning Gliquid's pools as the preferred venue for sophisticated LPs. HYPERLIQUID INTEGRATION Gliquid is a HyperEVM-native protocol with no HyperCore presence. It interfaces with HyperEVM's EVM execution layer for all contract logic — AMM pool management, routing contracts, and fee distribution. Users bridge HYPE and other assets from HyperCore to HyperEVM to interact with Gliquid. The protocol is positioned to benefit significantly from Hyperliquid's HIP-3 upgrade, which is expected to accelerate HyperEVM adoption by driving broader ecosystem activity. Gliquid's role as an infrastructure aggregator means that any new DEX or token launched on HyperEVM becomes a potential routing source, expanding its addressable liquidity without requiring direct protocol changes. The confirmed airdrop also creates strong alignment between Gliquid's growth trajectory and broader HyperEVM ecosystem expansion metrics — the more users bridge to HyperEVM to farm the Hyperliquid ecosystem, the more volume flows through Gliquid's aggregator. RISKS AND CONSIDERATIONS Gliquid faces three primary risk vectors. First, the V4 AMM is technically ambitious — hooks and custom pool logic introduce smart contract complexity that must be thoroughly audited; any exploit or critical bug in the pool architecture could result in LP losses and permanent TVL damage. Second, the aggregation market on HyperEVM is crowded: LiquidSwap, HyperBloom, and Laminar all compete for the same routing volume, and Gliquid's dominance is not guaranteed. Third, the airdrop-driven user base presents retention risk — without a compelling post-TGE use case, activity may drop sharply after token distribution. The team's pseudonymity, while common in DeFi, means there is limited accountability in the event of a technical failure or strategic pivot. No formal audits have been publicly confirmed. Potential users should treat Gliquid's smart contracts as experimental until audits are published.

Visit website
Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureGliquid logoGliquidKatoshi logoKatoshi
LayerHyperEVMHyperCore
CategoryDecentralized ExchangesTrading Bots & Automation
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year20252025
Websitegliquid.xyzkatoshi.ai
Twitter@gliquidx@KatoshiAI
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
DEXAMMV4concentrated-liquidity
AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial

Score Comparison

GliquidKatoshi
Open Source
Gliquid
Not public
Katoshi
Not public
Verified
Gliquid
Unverified
Katoshi
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Gliquid
4 tags
Katoshi
4 tags
Maturity
Gliquid
Since 2025
Katoshi
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureGliquid logoGliquidKatoshi logoKatoshi
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Gliquid operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Gliquid is focused on decentralized exchanges, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Unique Features

Gliquid is distinguished by: DEX, AMM, V4, concentrated-liquidity. Katoshi stands out with: AI, automation, trading-agents, non-custodial.

When to Use Each

Choose Gliquid if you...

  • Want a decentralized exchanges solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like DEX and AMM
  • Need: V4 AMM DEX on HyperEVM — $170M+ trading volume

Choose Katoshi if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
  • Need features like AI and automation
  • Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid

Ecosystem Integration

Gliquid logo

Gliquid

Gliquid operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Gliquid or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons