PERP.WIKI

Hyperliquid Names vs Dynamic

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Cross-Layer Alternatives

Quick Take

Hyperliquid Names .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem on HyperEVM, while Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer. Both compete in the wallets & account abstraction space but operate on different layers, which affects their capabilities and composability.

Based on public data for Hyperliquid Names and Dynamic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.

Visit website
Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid NamesDynamic logoDynamic
LayerHyperEVMMulti-Layer
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionWallets & Account Abstraction
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitehlnames.xyzdynamic.xyz
Twitter@hlnames
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
domainsidentitynamingENS-style

Score Comparison

Hyperliquid NamesDynamic
Open Source
Hyperliquid Names
Not public
Dynamic
Not public
Verified
Hyperliquid Names
Unverified
Dynamic
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Hyperliquid Names
4 tags
Dynamic
0 tags
Maturity
Hyperliquid Names
Since 2025
Dynamic
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid NamesDynamic logoDynamic
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while Dynamic runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

When to Use Each

Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like domains and identity
  • Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem

Choose Dynamic if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding

Ecosystem Integration

Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Hyperliquid Names or Dynamic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons