Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK vs Katoshi
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · SDKs & Developer Tools
Ecosystem PickQuick Take
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK Community TypeScript SDK for Hyperliquid supporting all major JS runtimes on Multi-Layer, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK
Multi-LayerCommunity TypeScript SDK for Hyperliquid supporting all major JS runtimes
github.comKatoshi
HyperCoreAI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
katoshi.aiOverview
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK
The Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK is a comprehensive, community-maintained client library for the Hyperliquid API, supporting all major JavaScript runtimes including Node.js, Deno, Bun, and browser environments. Written in TypeScript with full type coverage, the SDK provides ergonomic abstractions for REST API calls and WebSocket subscriptions, making it easy to build Hyperliquid integrations in the web ecosystem. The library handles authentication, request signing, WebSocket reconnection logic, and response parsing—letting developers focus on business logic rather than protocol details. It supports the full Hyperliquid API surface including order management, account queries, market data streaming, and HyperEVM interactions. With active maintenance and growing adoption in the developer community, this SDK is the standard choice for frontend applications and Node.js trading systems interfacing with Hyperliquid, bridging the gap for JavaScript developers entering the ecosystem.
Visit websiteKatoshi
Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperCore |
| Category | SDKs & Developer Tools | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | github.com | katoshi.ai |
| — | @KatoshiAI | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK is focused on sdks & developer tools, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK if you...
- ✓Want a sdks & developer tools solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Community TypeScript SDK for Hyperliquid supporting all major JS runtimes
Choose Katoshi if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like AI and automation
- ✓Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
Ecosystem Integration
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Katoshi
Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category