PERP.WIKI

Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK vs Panoptic

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · SDKs & Developer Tools

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK Community TypeScript SDK for Hyperliquid supporting all major JS runtimes on Multi-Layer, while Panoptic Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK and Panoptic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK

The Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK is a comprehensive, community-maintained client library for the Hyperliquid API, supporting all major JavaScript runtimes including Node.js, Deno, Bun, and browser environments. Written in TypeScript with full type coverage, the SDK provides ergonomic abstractions for REST API calls and WebSocket subscriptions, making it easy to build Hyperliquid integrations in the web ecosystem. The library handles authentication, request signing, WebSocket reconnection logic, and response parsing—letting developers focus on business logic rather than protocol details. It supports the full Hyperliquid API surface including order management, account queries, market data streaming, and HyperEVM interactions. With active maintenance and growing adoption in the developer community, this SDK is the standard choice for frontend applications and Node.js trading systems interfacing with Hyperliquid, bridging the gap for JavaScript developers entering the ecosystem.

Visit website
Panoptic logo

Panoptic

Panoptic is a groundbreaking perpetual options protocol built on Uniswap v3-style liquidity positions, enabling the permissionless creation and trading of any-strike, any-expiry options on any EVM token pair without the need for a traditional order book, options clearing house, or centralized counterparty. It represents one of the most technically sophisticated options primitives in DeFi, redefining how on-chain options are structured and priced. The protocol core insight is that Uniswap v3 concentrated liquidity positions are structurally equivalent to short-options payoff profiles. By reinterpreting and tokenizing these LP positions as options contracts, Panoptic enables traders to buy and sell calls and puts permissionlessly on any Uniswap v3 pool. Options sellers provide liquidity and collect streaming fees continuously, while options buyers pay a streaming premium instead of an upfront cost, eliminating the need for expiry dates and simplifying options mechanics for DeFi users. Panoptic supports multi-leg options strategies including spreads, straddles, strangles, and condors, all composable and expressible within a single transaction. This brings institutional-grade options strategy construction to DeFi for the first time in a fully on-chain, non-custodial format. On HyperEVM, where Uniswap v3-compatible concentrated liquidity DEXes are deploying, Panoptic enables sophisticated options trading on Hyperliquid spot assets. Options traders can express views on BTC, ETH, HYPE, and other assets with defined risk profiles, hedging perpetual positions or speculating on volatility surfaces. This complementary options layer adds significant depth to Hyperliquid existing perpetuals infrastructure. The protocol fee structure is directly linked to Uniswap v3 pool fee tiers of 0.05%, 0.30%, and 1.00%, and all pricing is derived from on-chain LP data, making Panoptic fully oracle-free and resistant to price manipulation. Liquidations are handled through a force-exercise mechanism that incentivizes third parties to close at-risk positions without centralized liquidators. Panoptic is targeted at experienced DeFi traders, options market makers, and quant funds seeking to build options books on-chain. Its gas-efficient design, deep Uniswap v3 integration, and novel streaming premium model make it one of the most technically innovative derivatives protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureHyperliquid TypeScript SDKPanoptic logoPanoptic
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategorySDKs & Developer ToolsDecentralized Exchanges
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitegithub.companoptic.xyz
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

Hyperliquid TypeScript SDKPanoptic
Open Source
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK
Not public
Panoptic
Not public
Verified
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK
Unverified
Panoptic
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK
0 tags
Panoptic
0 tags
Maturity
Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK
Unknown
Panoptic
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureHyperliquid TypeScript SDKPanoptic logoPanoptic
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK is focused on sdks & developer tools, while Panoptic targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK if you...

  • Want a sdks & developer tools solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Community TypeScript SDK for Hyperliquid supporting all major JS runtimes

Choose Panoptic if you...

  • Want a decentralized exchanges solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs

Ecosystem Integration

Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK

Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Panoptic logo

Panoptic

Panoptic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Hyperliquid TypeScript SDK or Panoptic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons