PERP.WIKI

Hyperscanner vs Mizu

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data

Best for Research
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Hyperscanner Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Mizu Unified liquidity layer and yield aggregator for HyperEVM on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Hyperscanner and Mizu. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Hyperscanner logo

Hyperscanner

Hyperscanner is a unified analytics and data platform spanning both Hyperliquid L1 — the high-performance perpetuals exchange — and HyperEVM, the EVM-compatible smart contract execution layer. It addresses the fragmentation inherent in Hyperliquid's dual-chain architecture: traders and developers previously needed to consult disconnected explorers and dashboards to get a complete picture of ecosystem activity. Hyperscanner aggregates on-chain data into clean, accessible interfaces featuring real-time market overviews, token analytics, wallet tracking, volume trends, and trading signals derived from live chain activity. For traders, it offers a bird's-eye view of market conditions — open interest shifts, volume anomalies, and emerging token activity on HyperEVM. For developers and researchers, it provides an exploration and indexing layer for understanding ecosystem growth, protocol adoption, and on-chain behavior. By bridging the data gap between Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM in a single coherent product, Hyperscanner makes the ecosystem more legible and navigable — lowering the barrier for new participants and giving experienced users the signals they need to stay ahead of market developments.

Visit website
Mizu logo

Mizu

Mizu Labs is an automated yield aggregator protocol deployed on HyperEVM, Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible smart contract layer. Designed for ETH and BTC holders seeking to maximize returns within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, Mizu issues liquid wrapper tokens — hypeETH and hypeBTC — representing bridged assets that are continuously deployed across the highest-yielding HyperEVM protocols. Under the hood, Mizu automates liquidity routing into established platforms including HyperLend, HypurrFi, Felix, and Harmonix, compounding rewards and rebalancing positions without requiring manual intervention from depositors. This set-and-forget approach makes Mizu ideal for users who want exposure to HyperEVM's rich DeFi landscape — spanning lending markets, stablecoin minting, and structured yield products — without the overhead of active position management. By aggregating liquidity from many depositors, Mizu accesses yield opportunities at scale that would be inefficient for individual wallets. The protocol participates in points programs across its integrated protocols, passing accumulated rewards back to hypeETH and hypeBTC holders. As HyperEVM matures as a composable DeFi layer beneath Hyperliquid's core trading infrastructure, Mizu Labs positions itself as the primary yield optimization engine for bridged capital seeking productive, automated deployment.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureHyperscanner logoHyperscannerMizu logoMizu
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryAnalytics & DataYield & Vaults
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year20252025
Websitehyperscanner.appmizulabs.xyz
Twitter@hyperscanner_io@mizulabs
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
analyticsscannersignalsmulti-layer
yield-aggregatorvaultsmulti-assetBoringVault

Score Comparison

HyperscannerMizu
Open Source
Hyperscanner
Not public
Mizu
Not public
Verified
Hyperscanner
Unverified
Mizu
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Hyperscanner
4 tags
Mizu
4 tags
Maturity
Hyperscanner
Since 2025
Mizu
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureHyperscanner logoHyperscannerMizu logoMizu
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Hyperscanner operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Mizu runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Hyperscanner is focused on analytics & data, while Mizu targets yield & vaults. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Unique Features

Hyperscanner is distinguished by: analytics, scanner, signals, multi-layer. Mizu stands out with: yield-aggregator, vaults, multi-asset, BoringVault.

When to Use Each

Choose Hyperscanner if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need features like analytics and scanner
  • Need: Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM

Choose Mizu if you...

  • Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like yield-aggregator and vaults
  • Need: Unified liquidity layer and yield aggregator for HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Hyperscanner logo

Hyperscanner

Hyperscanner operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Mizu logo

Mizu

Mizu operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Hyperscanner or Mizu to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons