Hyperscanner vs Okotoki
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data
Best for ResearchQuick Take
Hyperscanner Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Okotoki Professional trading terminal purpose-built for Hyperliquid power users on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Hyperscanner and Okotoki. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Hyperscanner
Multi-LayerUnified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM
hyperscanner.app
Okotoki
Multi-LayerProfessional trading terminal purpose-built for Hyperliquid power users
okotoki.comOverview
Hyperscanner
Hyperscanner is a unified analytics and data platform spanning both Hyperliquid L1 — the high-performance perpetuals exchange — and HyperEVM, the EVM-compatible smart contract execution layer. It addresses the fragmentation inherent in Hyperliquid's dual-chain architecture: traders and developers previously needed to consult disconnected explorers and dashboards to get a complete picture of ecosystem activity. Hyperscanner aggregates on-chain data into clean, accessible interfaces featuring real-time market overviews, token analytics, wallet tracking, volume trends, and trading signals derived from live chain activity. For traders, it offers a bird's-eye view of market conditions — open interest shifts, volume anomalies, and emerging token activity on HyperEVM. For developers and researchers, it provides an exploration and indexing layer for understanding ecosystem growth, protocol adoption, and on-chain behavior. By bridging the data gap between Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM in a single coherent product, Hyperscanner makes the ecosystem more legible and navigable — lowering the barrier for new participants and giving experienced users the signals they need to stay ahead of market developments.
Visit websiteOkotoki
Okotoki is a professional trading terminal purpose-built for Hyperliquid, offering a sophisticated interface for active perpetuals traders who need more than the native UI. Okotoki's multi-panel layout supports side-by-side charting of multiple assets, a full order entry panel with advanced order types, and a live order book visualizer that renders Hyperliquid's L2 order book depth in real time. Its built-in trade journal automatically records entries and exits with P&L attribution, helping traders analyze performance over time. Okotoki also includes a position heat map showing portfolio-level exposure and risk metrics for perp positions. By combining the speed of Hyperliquid's matching engine with a feature-rich trading interface, Okotoki caters to the growing cohort of professional traders who have migrated from CEXes to Hyperliquid and demand institutional-grade tooling without sacrificing the non-custodial benefits of decentralized trading.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Analytics & Data | Trading Terminals & Interfaces |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2025 | — |
| Website | hyperscanner.app | okotoki.com |
| @hyperscanner_io | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | analyticsscannersignalsmulti-layer | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Hyperscanner is focused on analytics & data, while Okotoki targets trading terminals & interfaces. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Hyperscanner if you...
- ✓Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need features like analytics and scanner
- ✓Need: Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM
Choose Okotoki if you...
- ✓Want a trading terminals & interfaces solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Professional trading terminal purpose-built for Hyperliquid power users
Ecosystem Integration
Hyperscanner
Hyperscanner operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Okotoki
Okotoki operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Hyperscanner or Okotoki to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category