Hyperscanner vs Stork Network
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data
Best for ResearchQuick Take
Hyperscanner Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Stork Network Ultra-low latency pull oracle purpose-built for Hyperliquid-native DeFi on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Hyperscanner and Stork Network. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Hyperscanner
Multi-LayerUnified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM
hyperscanner.app
Stork Network
Multi-LayerUltra-low latency pull oracle purpose-built for Hyperliquid-native DeFi
stork.networkOverview
Hyperscanner
Hyperscanner is a unified analytics and data platform spanning both Hyperliquid L1 — the high-performance perpetuals exchange — and HyperEVM, the EVM-compatible smart contract execution layer. It addresses the fragmentation inherent in Hyperliquid's dual-chain architecture: traders and developers previously needed to consult disconnected explorers and dashboards to get a complete picture of ecosystem activity. Hyperscanner aggregates on-chain data into clean, accessible interfaces featuring real-time market overviews, token analytics, wallet tracking, volume trends, and trading signals derived from live chain activity. For traders, it offers a bird's-eye view of market conditions — open interest shifts, volume anomalies, and emerging token activity on HyperEVM. For developers and researchers, it provides an exploration and indexing layer for understanding ecosystem growth, protocol adoption, and on-chain behavior. By bridging the data gap between Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM in a single coherent product, Hyperscanner makes the ecosystem more legible and navigable — lowering the barrier for new participants and giving experienced users the signals they need to stay ahead of market developments.
Visit websiteStork Network
Stork is a low-latency, first-party oracle network purpose-built for high-performance DeFi applications like Hyperliquid. Unlike traditional oracle solutions, Stork delivers signed price updates directly to end-users, enabling on-demand data consumption without sacrificing freshness. Designed for derivatives and perpetuals markets where sub-millisecond price accuracy is critical, Stork has become a key infrastructure layer for HyperEVM protocols. Its publisher-agnostic design allows projects to integrate multiple data sources under a unified interface, and its architecture supports hundreds of asset feeds with cryptographic attestation. Stork's emphasis on ultra-low latency makes it ideal for Hyperliquid's high-throughput matching engine, where stale oracle prices can create exploitable arbitrage or unfair liquidations. Projects building options, structured products, or complex derivatives on HyperEVM rely on Stork for the price freshness that underpins safe, capital-efficient protocols.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Analytics & Data | Oracles |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2025 | — |
| Website | hyperscanner.app | stork.network |
| @hyperscanner_io | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | analyticsscannersignalsmulti-layer | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Hyperscanner is focused on analytics & data, while Stork Network targets oracles. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Hyperscanner if you...
- ✓Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need features like analytics and scanner
- ✓Need: Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM
Choose Stork Network if you...
- ✓Want a oracles solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Ultra-low latency pull oracle purpose-built for Hyperliquid-native DeFi
Ecosystem Integration
Hyperscanner
Hyperscanner operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Stork Network
Stork Network operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Hyperscanner or Stork Network to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category