PERP.WIKI

Katoshi vs Mizu

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation

Best for Traders
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore, while Mizu Unified liquidity layer and yield aggregator for HyperEVM on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Katoshi and Mizu. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.

Visit website
Mizu logo

Mizu

Mizu Labs is an automated yield aggregator protocol deployed on HyperEVM, Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible smart contract layer. Designed for ETH and BTC holders seeking to maximize returns within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, Mizu issues liquid wrapper tokens — hypeETH and hypeBTC — representing bridged assets that are continuously deployed across the highest-yielding HyperEVM protocols. Under the hood, Mizu automates liquidity routing into established platforms including HyperLend, HypurrFi, Felix, and Harmonix, compounding rewards and rebalancing positions without requiring manual intervention from depositors. This set-and-forget approach makes Mizu ideal for users who want exposure to HyperEVM's rich DeFi landscape — spanning lending markets, stablecoin minting, and structured yield products — without the overhead of active position management. By aggregating liquidity from many depositors, Mizu accesses yield opportunities at scale that would be inefficient for individual wallets. The protocol participates in points programs across its integrated protocols, passing accumulated rewards back to hypeETH and hypeBTC holders. As HyperEVM matures as a composable DeFi layer beneath Hyperliquid's core trading infrastructure, Mizu Labs positions itself as the primary yield optimization engine for bridged capital seeking productive, automated deployment.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureKatoshi logoKatoshiMizu logoMizu
LayerHyperCoreHyperEVM
CategoryTrading Bots & AutomationYield & Vaults
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year20252025
Websitekatoshi.aimizulabs.xyz
Twitter@KatoshiAI@mizulabs
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial
yield-aggregatorvaultsmulti-assetBoringVault

Score Comparison

KatoshiMizu
Open Source
Katoshi
Not public
Mizu
Not public
Verified
Katoshi
Unverified
Mizu
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Katoshi
4 tags
Mizu
4 tags
Maturity
Katoshi
Since 2025
Mizu
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureKatoshi logoKatoshiMizu logoMizu
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook), while Mizu runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Katoshi is focused on trading bots & automation, while Mizu targets yield & vaults. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Unique Features

Katoshi is distinguished by: AI, automation, trading-agents, non-custodial. Mizu stands out with: yield-aggregator, vaults, multi-asset, BoringVault.

When to Use Each

Choose Katoshi if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
  • Need features like AI and automation
  • Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid

Choose Mizu if you...

  • Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like yield-aggregator and vaults
  • Need: Unified liquidity layer and yield aggregator for HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.

Mizu logo

Mizu

Mizu operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Katoshi or Mizu to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons