Katoshi vs Valantis
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore, while Valantis Modular DEX with LST-optimized pools — acquired StakedHYPE on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Katoshi and Valantis. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Katoshi
HyperCoreAI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
katoshi.aiValantis
HyperEVMModular DEX with LST-optimized pools — acquired StakedHYPE
valantis.xyzOverview
Katoshi
Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.
Visit websiteValantis
Valantis is a modular decentralized exchange protocol deployed on HyperEVM, designed to give liquidity providers and protocol developers unprecedented flexibility in how AMMs are constructed and customized. At its core is STEX — a next-generation AMM architecture purpose-built for liquid staking token pools, solving the persistent problem of capital inefficiency and high slippage that plagues standard AMMs when handling correlated or yield-bearing assets. Valantis separates exchange logic into composable modules: sovereign pools, HOT (Hybrid Order Type) AMMs, and pluggable liquidity management strategies — allowing developers to integrate custom pricing curves, fee tiers, and rebalancing logic without forking the entire protocol stack. For liquidity providers, this means substantially better capital efficiency and reduced impermanent loss on correlated pairs. For protocols building on HyperEVM, it means a flexible DEX infrastructure layer that can be tailored to specific tokenomics and use cases. Valantis fits naturally into the Hyperliquid ecosystem by providing foundational trading infrastructure that DeFi primitives — lending markets, derivatives vaults, and yield protocols — depend on for deep, efficient, and programmable liquidity.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | HyperCore | HyperEVM |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Decentralized Exchanges |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Website | katoshi.ai | valantis.xyz |
| @KatoshiAI | @ValantisLabs | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | ✓ Verified |
| Tags | AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial | DEXmodularLST-poolsSTEX |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook), while Valantis runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Katoshi is focused on trading bots & automation, while Valantis targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Unique Features
Katoshi is distinguished by: AI, automation, trading-agents, non-custodial. Valantis stands out with: DEX, modular, LST-pools, STEX.
When to Use Each
Choose Katoshi if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like AI and automation
- ✓Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
Choose Valantis if you...
- ✓Want a decentralized exchanges solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
- ✓Need features like DEX and modular
- ✓Need: Modular DEX with LST-optimized pools — acquired StakedHYPE
Ecosystem Integration
Katoshi
Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Valantis
Valantis operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Katoshi or Valantis to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category