PERP.WIKI

Nansen vs The Graph

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data

Best for Research
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Nansen Blockchain analytics platform tracking smart money flows on Hyperliquid on Multi-Layer, while The Graph Decentralized indexing protocol for building GraphQL APIs from HyperEVM smart contracts on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Nansen and The Graph. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Nansen logo

Nansen

Nansen is the industry-leading on-chain analytics platform that enriches blockchain data with millions of wallet labels, enabling traders and investors to track smart money flows across Hyperliquid and 40+ blockchains. By identifying wallets belonging to exchanges, funds, whales, and DeFi protocols, Nansen transforms raw on-chain data into actionable intelligence. On Hyperliquid, Nansen tracks large perp position changes, wallet inflows and outflows to the L1, and the trading behavior of labeled professional accounts. Its Token God Mode feature provides a 360-degree view of any Hyperliquid spot token's holder distribution, trading volume, and liquidity depth. Nansen's alerting system notifies users when smart money wallets make significant moves in Hyperliquid markets, giving a critical edge in fast-moving crypto environments. The platform's AI-enhanced research tools help investors quickly synthesize on-chain signals into investment theses across the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Visit website
The Graph logo

The Graph

The Graph is the decentralized indexing protocol for blockchain data, enabling HyperEVM developers to build and deploy Subgraphs—open APIs that index, transform, and serve on-chain data via GraphQL. Rather than building custom indexing infrastructure, HyperEVM protocol teams can define their data schema and indexing logic in a Subgraph manifest, and The Graph's decentralized network of Indexers handles the computation and data serving. This dramatically accelerates frontend development for Hyperliquid DeFi dApps that need historical and real-time on-chain data without running centralized backend infrastructure. Subgraph data is trustless and cryptographically verifiable, making it appropriate for decentralized applications that want to maintain censorship-resistance. The Graph's GRT token incentivizes high-quality, reliable data indexing, ensuring HyperEVM Subgraphs remain continuously available and accurate for users and developers building on Hyperliquid's smart contract ecosystem.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureNansen logoNansenThe Graph logoThe Graph
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryAnalytics & DataData APIs
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitenansen.aithegraph.com
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

NansenThe Graph
Open Source
Nansen
Not public
The Graph
Not public
Verified
Nansen
Unverified
The Graph
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Nansen
0 tags
The Graph
0 tags
Maturity
Nansen
Unknown
The Graph
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureNansen logoNansenThe Graph logoThe Graph
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Nansen is focused on analytics & data, while The Graph targets data apis. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Nansen if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Blockchain analytics platform tracking smart money flows on Hyperliquid

Choose The Graph if you...

  • Want a data apis solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Decentralized indexing protocol for building GraphQL APIs from HyperEVM smart contracts

Ecosystem Integration

Nansen logo

Nansen

Nansen operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

The Graph logo

The Graph

The Graph operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Nansen or The Graph to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons