Nansen vs Zellic
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data
Best for ResearchQuick Take
Nansen Blockchain analytics platform tracking smart money flows on Hyperliquid on Multi-Layer, while Zellic Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Nansen and Zellic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Nansen
Multi-LayerBlockchain analytics platform tracking smart money flows on Hyperliquid
nansen.ai
Zellic
Multi-LayerRising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise
zellic.ioOverview
Nansen
Nansen is the industry-leading on-chain analytics platform that enriches blockchain data with millions of wallet labels, enabling traders and investors to track smart money flows across Hyperliquid and 40+ blockchains. By identifying wallets belonging to exchanges, funds, whales, and DeFi protocols, Nansen transforms raw on-chain data into actionable intelligence. On Hyperliquid, Nansen tracks large perp position changes, wallet inflows and outflows to the L1, and the trading behavior of labeled professional accounts. Its Token God Mode feature provides a 360-degree view of any Hyperliquid spot token's holder distribution, trading volume, and liquidity depth. Nansen's alerting system notifies users when smart money wallets make significant moves in Hyperliquid markets, giving a critical edge in fast-moving crypto environments. The platform's AI-enhanced research tools help investors quickly synthesize on-chain signals into investment theses across the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Visit websiteZellic
Zellic is a rapidly growing blockchain security firm that combines deep smart contract expertise with strong cryptographic and systems security knowledge, serving protocols across EVM ecosystems including HyperEVM. Founded by top competitive CTF players, Zellic's team brings an attacker's mindset to every engagement, proactively identifying vulnerabilities in complex DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, and financial primitives. Zellic has audited hundreds of millions in TVL across lending protocols, DEXes, and infrastructure projects—many architecturally similar to what is being built on Hyperliquid. Their reports are known for clear vulnerability disclosure with actionable remediation guidance. For HyperEVM projects seeking an audit firm with fresh perspectives and a strong track record in cutting-edge DeFi security research, Zellic provides rigorous assessment that complements the traditional audit landscape and has earned a reputation as one of the most thorough firms for complex protocol reviews.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Analytics & Data | Security & Audits |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | nansen.ai | zellic.io |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Nansen is focused on analytics & data, while Zellic targets security & audits. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Nansen if you...
- ✓Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Blockchain analytics platform tracking smart money flows on Hyperliquid
Choose Zellic if you...
- ✓Want a security & audits solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise
Ecosystem Integration
Nansen
Nansen operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Zellic
Zellic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Nansen or Zellic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category