NAVI Protocol vs Zellic
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing
Best for BorrowersQuick Take
NAVI Protocol Aave-inspired pooled lending and borrowing native to HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Zellic Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for NAVI Protocol and Zellic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
NAVI Protocol
Multi-LayerAave-inspired pooled lending and borrowing native to HyperEVM
naviprotocol.ioZellic
Multi-LayerRising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise
zellic.ioOverview
NAVI Protocol
NAVI Protocol is a leading decentralized liquidity protocol bringing efficient lending and borrowing infrastructure to the HyperEVM ecosystem, modeled after battle-tested money market designs like Aave v3. NAVI enables permissionless money markets where users can supply assets to earn yield and borrow against their collateral with transparent, algorithmically determined interest rates. The protocol supports a broad range of assets including HYPE the native Hyperliquid token, stablecoins USDC and USDT, ETH, and bridged tokens from Ethereum and other chains. Each asset has dedicated supply and borrow pools with utilization-based interest rate models: as demand for borrowing increases relative to available supply, borrow rates rise automatically to attract more depositors and moderate borrowing activity, maintaining stable pool utilization and ensuring lenders are compensated fairly for deployed capital. NAVI collateral management framework allows users to supply multiple assets as collateral simultaneously and borrow against a blended LTV ratio, enabling more capital-efficient borrowing positions compared to single-collateral models. The protocol risk parameters including loan-to-value ratios, liquidation thresholds, and liquidation bonuses are calibrated per asset based on liquidity, volatility, and oracle reliability. For HyperEVM DeFi participants, NAVI opens up a range of leveraged strategies: borrowing stablecoins against HYPE collateral to deploy into yield farms, leveraging up ETH positions, or accessing working capital without selling underlying assets. Borrowed funds can be deployed directly into Hyperliquid spot markets and DEXes, creating a tightly integrated leverage loop within the HyperEVM DeFi ecosystem. NAVI liquidation engine incentivizes third-party liquidators to maintain protocol health by allowing them to repay undercollateralized debt in exchange for discounted collateral. This decentralized liquidation model ensures the protocol can handle rapid market moves without centralized operators, maintaining solvency across all market conditions. The protocol features a governance token enabling community-driven upgrades to risk parameters, supported assets, and protocol fees. With a clean UI, clear risk disclosures, and integration with leading HyperEVM wallets, NAVI is accessible to both retail DeFi participants seeking stablecoin yield and institutional players using borrowing as a sophisticated portfolio management tool.
Visit websiteZellic
Zellic is a rapidly growing blockchain security firm that combines deep smart contract expertise with strong cryptographic and systems security knowledge, serving protocols across EVM ecosystems including HyperEVM. Founded by top competitive CTF players, Zellic's team brings an attacker's mindset to every engagement, proactively identifying vulnerabilities in complex DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, and financial primitives. Zellic has audited hundreds of millions in TVL across lending protocols, DEXes, and infrastructure projects—many architecturally similar to what is being built on Hyperliquid. Their reports are known for clear vulnerability disclosure with actionable remediation guidance. For HyperEVM projects seeking an audit firm with fresh perspectives and a strong track record in cutting-edge DeFi security research, Zellic provides rigorous assessment that complements the traditional audit landscape and has earned a reputation as one of the most thorough firms for complex protocol reviews.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Lending & Borrowing | Security & Audits |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | naviprotocol.io | zellic.io |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
NAVI Protocol is focused on lending & borrowing, while Zellic targets security & audits. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose NAVI Protocol if you...
- ✓Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Aave-inspired pooled lending and borrowing native to HyperEVM
Choose Zellic if you...
- ✓Want a security & audits solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise
Ecosystem Integration
NAVI Protocol
NAVI Protocol operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Zellic
Zellic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with NAVI Protocol or Zellic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category