PERP.WIKI

OpenZeppelin vs Panoptic

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Security & Audits

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

OpenZeppelin Gold standard smart contract security library and audit services for HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Panoptic Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for OpenZeppelin and Panoptic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

OpenZeppelin logo

OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin is the gold standard for smart contract security, providing audited contract libraries, security tooling, and professional audit services for projects building on HyperEVM and other EVM chains. The OpenZeppelin Contracts library—used by thousands of protocols worldwide—provides secure, gas-optimized implementations of ERC token standards, access control patterns, and DeFi primitives that HyperEVM developers rely on as foundational building blocks. OpenZeppelin Defender provides automated security operations including contract monitoring, automated incident response, and upgrade management through time locks and multi-sig governance. For protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem handling significant user funds, engaging OpenZeppelin for security audits provides the highest level of third-party validation, with OpenZeppelin's researchers having an unmatched track record in identifying vulnerabilities before they become exploits. Their open-source contract library has been the foundation of countless secure DeFi protocols.

Visit website
Panoptic logo

Panoptic

Panoptic is a groundbreaking perpetual options protocol built on Uniswap v3-style liquidity positions, enabling the permissionless creation and trading of any-strike, any-expiry options on any EVM token pair without the need for a traditional order book, options clearing house, or centralized counterparty. It represents one of the most technically sophisticated options primitives in DeFi, redefining how on-chain options are structured and priced. The protocol core insight is that Uniswap v3 concentrated liquidity positions are structurally equivalent to short-options payoff profiles. By reinterpreting and tokenizing these LP positions as options contracts, Panoptic enables traders to buy and sell calls and puts permissionlessly on any Uniswap v3 pool. Options sellers provide liquidity and collect streaming fees continuously, while options buyers pay a streaming premium instead of an upfront cost, eliminating the need for expiry dates and simplifying options mechanics for DeFi users. Panoptic supports multi-leg options strategies including spreads, straddles, strangles, and condors, all composable and expressible within a single transaction. This brings institutional-grade options strategy construction to DeFi for the first time in a fully on-chain, non-custodial format. On HyperEVM, where Uniswap v3-compatible concentrated liquidity DEXes are deploying, Panoptic enables sophisticated options trading on Hyperliquid spot assets. Options traders can express views on BTC, ETH, HYPE, and other assets with defined risk profiles, hedging perpetual positions or speculating on volatility surfaces. This complementary options layer adds significant depth to Hyperliquid existing perpetuals infrastructure. The protocol fee structure is directly linked to Uniswap v3 pool fee tiers of 0.05%, 0.30%, and 1.00%, and all pricing is derived from on-chain LP data, making Panoptic fully oracle-free and resistant to price manipulation. Liquidations are handled through a force-exercise mechanism that incentivizes third parties to close at-risk positions without centralized liquidators. Panoptic is targeted at experienced DeFi traders, options market makers, and quant funds seeking to build options books on-chain. Its gas-efficient design, deep Uniswap v3 integration, and novel streaming premium model make it one of the most technically innovative derivatives protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureOpenZeppelin logoOpenZeppelinPanoptic logoPanoptic
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategorySecurity & AuditsDecentralized Exchanges
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websiteopenzeppelin.companoptic.xyz
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

OpenZeppelinPanoptic
Open Source
OpenZeppelin
Not public
Panoptic
Not public
Verified
OpenZeppelin
Unverified
Panoptic
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
OpenZeppelin
0 tags
Panoptic
0 tags
Maturity
OpenZeppelin
Unknown
Panoptic
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureOpenZeppelin logoOpenZeppelinPanoptic logoPanoptic
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

OpenZeppelin is focused on security & audits, while Panoptic targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose OpenZeppelin if you...

  • Want a security & audits solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Gold standard smart contract security library and audit services for HyperEVM

Choose Panoptic if you...

  • Want a decentralized exchanges solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs

Ecosystem Integration

OpenZeppelin logo

OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Panoptic logo

Panoptic

Panoptic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with OpenZeppelin or Panoptic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons