PERP.WIKI

Panoptic vs Passivbot

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Decentralized Exchanges

Best for Swaps
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Panoptic Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs on Multi-Layer, while Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Panoptic and Passivbot. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Panoptic logo

Panoptic

Panoptic is a groundbreaking perpetual options protocol built on Uniswap v3-style liquidity positions, enabling the permissionless creation and trading of any-strike, any-expiry options on any EVM token pair without the need for a traditional order book, options clearing house, or centralized counterparty. It represents one of the most technically sophisticated options primitives in DeFi, redefining how on-chain options are structured and priced. The protocol core insight is that Uniswap v3 concentrated liquidity positions are structurally equivalent to short-options payoff profiles. By reinterpreting and tokenizing these LP positions as options contracts, Panoptic enables traders to buy and sell calls and puts permissionlessly on any Uniswap v3 pool. Options sellers provide liquidity and collect streaming fees continuously, while options buyers pay a streaming premium instead of an upfront cost, eliminating the need for expiry dates and simplifying options mechanics for DeFi users. Panoptic supports multi-leg options strategies including spreads, straddles, strangles, and condors, all composable and expressible within a single transaction. This brings institutional-grade options strategy construction to DeFi for the first time in a fully on-chain, non-custodial format. On HyperEVM, where Uniswap v3-compatible concentrated liquidity DEXes are deploying, Panoptic enables sophisticated options trading on Hyperliquid spot assets. Options traders can express views on BTC, ETH, HYPE, and other assets with defined risk profiles, hedging perpetual positions or speculating on volatility surfaces. This complementary options layer adds significant depth to Hyperliquid existing perpetuals infrastructure. The protocol fee structure is directly linked to Uniswap v3 pool fee tiers of 0.05%, 0.30%, and 1.00%, and all pricing is derived from on-chain LP data, making Panoptic fully oracle-free and resistant to price manipulation. Liquidations are handled through a force-exercise mechanism that incentivizes third parties to close at-risk positions without centralized liquidators. Panoptic is targeted at experienced DeFi traders, options market makers, and quant funds seeking to build options books on-chain. Its gas-efficient design, deep Uniswap v3 integration, and novel streaming premium model make it one of the most technically innovative derivatives protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Visit website

Passivbot

Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeaturePanoptic logoPanopticPassivbot
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryDecentralized ExchangesTrading Bots & Automation
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitepanoptic.xyzgithub.com
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

PanopticPassivbot
Open Source
Panoptic
Not public
Passivbot
Not public
Verified
Panoptic
Unverified
Passivbot
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Panoptic
0 tags
Passivbot
0 tags
Maturity
Panoptic
Unknown
Passivbot
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeaturePanoptic logoPanopticPassivbot
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Panoptic is focused on decentralized exchanges, while Passivbot targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Panoptic if you...

  • Want a decentralized exchanges solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs

Choose Passivbot if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support

Ecosystem Integration

Panoptic logo

Panoptic

Panoptic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Passivbot

Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Panoptic or Passivbot to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons