PERP.WIKI

Particle Network vs Gauntlet

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Particle Network Chain abstraction and account abstraction layer for seamless HyperEVM onboarding on Multi-Layer, while Gauntlet Financial risk modeling and protocol optimization for DeFi protocols on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Particle Network and Gauntlet. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Particle Network logo

Particle Network

Particle Network is a modular chain abstraction layer and account abstraction infrastructure provider that enables seamless Web3 onboarding across all EVM chains including HyperEVM. Its Universal Accounts allow users to maintain a single balance and identity across all blockchains, automatically routing transactions through the most efficient path—eliminating the need to manually bridge assets before interacting with HyperEVM protocols. Particle's Smart Wallet-as-a-Service enables dApps on HyperEVM to offer social login, gasless transactions, and batched operations through ERC-4337 account abstraction, dramatically reducing friction for new users. With MPC-based key management, users get Web2-style recovery options without sacrificing self-custody. Particle is a key infrastructure layer for HyperEVM projects that want to onboard mainstream users without burdening them with crypto UX complexity—making it especially valuable for NFT platforms, gaming, and consumer DeFi applications on Hyperliquid.

Visit website

Gauntlet

Gauntlet is a financial risk management and protocol optimization platform that uses agent-based market simulations to stress-test DeFi protocols and optimize their economic parameters. As protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem scale their TVL in lending markets and liquidity vaults, Gauntlet's simulation engine models adversarial behaviors, market crashes, and oracle manipulation scenarios to identify parameter configurations that maximize capital efficiency while minimizing insolvency risk. Gauntlet provides ongoing risk management services—continuously updating protocol parameters like liquidation bonuses, borrow caps, and collateral ratios in response to changing market conditions. With a track record managing billions in risk across Aave, Compound, and other top DeFi protocols, Gauntlet brings institutional-grade risk science to the growing Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Protocols that engage Gauntlet signal commitment to sustainable, risk-managed growth rather than aggressive TVL maximization at the expense of security.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureParticle Network logoParticle NetworkGauntlet
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionAnalytics & Data
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websiteparticle.networkgauntlet.xyz
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

Particle NetworkGauntlet
Open Source
Particle Network
Not public
Gauntlet
Not public
Verified
Particle Network
Unverified
Gauntlet
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Particle Network
0 tags
Gauntlet
0 tags
Maturity
Particle Network
Unknown
Gauntlet
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureParticle Network logoParticle NetworkGauntlet
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Particle Network is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Gauntlet targets analytics & data. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Particle Network if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Chain abstraction and account abstraction layer for seamless HyperEVM onboarding

Choose Gauntlet if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Financial risk modeling and protocol optimization for DeFi protocols on HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Particle Network logo

Particle Network

Particle Network operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Gauntlet

Gauntlet operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Particle Network or Gauntlet to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons