Particle Network vs Katoshi
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction
Ecosystem PickQuick Take
Particle Network Chain abstraction and account abstraction layer for seamless HyperEVM onboarding on Multi-Layer, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Particle Network and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Particle Network
Multi-LayerChain abstraction and account abstraction layer for seamless HyperEVM onboarding
particle.network
Katoshi
HyperCoreAI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
katoshi.aiOverview
Particle Network
Particle Network is a modular chain abstraction layer and account abstraction infrastructure provider that enables seamless Web3 onboarding across all EVM chains including HyperEVM. Its Universal Accounts allow users to maintain a single balance and identity across all blockchains, automatically routing transactions through the most efficient path—eliminating the need to manually bridge assets before interacting with HyperEVM protocols. Particle's Smart Wallet-as-a-Service enables dApps on HyperEVM to offer social login, gasless transactions, and batched operations through ERC-4337 account abstraction, dramatically reducing friction for new users. With MPC-based key management, users get Web2-style recovery options without sacrificing self-custody. Particle is a key infrastructure layer for HyperEVM projects that want to onboard mainstream users without burdening them with crypto UX complexity—making it especially valuable for NFT platforms, gaming, and consumer DeFi applications on Hyperliquid.
Visit websiteKatoshi
Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperCore |
| Category | Wallets & Account Abstraction | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | particle.network | katoshi.ai |
| — | @KatoshiAI | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Particle Network operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Particle Network is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Particle Network if you...
- ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Chain abstraction and account abstraction layer for seamless HyperEVM onboarding
Choose Katoshi if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like AI and automation
- ✓Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
Ecosystem Integration
Particle Network
Particle Network operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Katoshi
Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Particle Network or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category