PERP.WIKI

RedStone vs Hyperbloom

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Oracles

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus AreasVerified: RedStone

Quick Take

RedStone Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Hyperbloom DEX aggregator and autocompounding yield optimizer on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for RedStone and Hyperbloom. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone is a modular blockchain oracle network that has become the dominant oracle solution on Hyperliquid, operating under the HyperStone brand for the ecosystem. Oracles are critical infrastructure — they provide smart contracts with real-world price feeds, enabling DeFi lending, derivatives, and synthetic assets to function correctly. RedStone's architecture is uniquely well-suited to Hyperliquid's high-performance environment: rather than pushing price updates to the chain on every tick (a costly approach), RedStone uses a pull-based model where data is fetched on-demand and cryptographically verified on-chain, dramatically reducing costs while maintaining freshness and accuracy. Securing approximately 99.5% of oracle-protected value on Hyperliquid, HyperStone feeds power a wide range of DeFi protocols on HyperEVM — from lending markets to perpetual protocols and yield vaults. RedStone aggregates price data from dozens of sources, applying outlier filtering and cryptographic attestation to ensure data integrity. With support for hundreds of assets and sub-second update latency, HyperStone gives Hyperliquid's DeFi ecosystem enterprise-grade price feeds, enabling complex financial products to be built with confidence in the underlying data infrastructure.

Visit website
Hyperbloom logo

Hyperbloom

HyperBloom is a DeFi SuperApp built on HyperEVM that combines a DEX aggregator with auto-compounding yield vaults, delivering best-in-class swap rates and maximized APYs across the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Its aggregator routes trades through a unified smart contract that covers liquidity from 10 integrated DEXs — including HyperSwap, KittenSwap, Curve, Laminar, Gliquid, Hybra, HyperCat, ProjectX, Valantis, and Ramses — plus HyperCore order-book depth, all settled in a single non-custodial transaction with no custody risk. For yield seekers, HyperBloom's auto-compounding vaults employ a proprietary YieldIQ strategy: on-chain algorithms that dynamically optimize liquidity positions, compound rewards continuously, and minimize unnecessary rebalancing and gas costs. Vaults support single-token deposits, eliminating the complexity of fixed 50/50 LP ratios and letting users retain directional preference over their underlying assets. Vault tokens represent proportional claims on deposits plus accumulated yield, redeemable at any time. HyperBloom also features a liquidity locker, a developer-facing widget API, and a points program — making it a comprehensive infrastructure layer for traders, LPs, and protocols building on HyperEVM.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureRedStone logoRedStoneHyperbloom logoHyperbloom
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryOraclesYield & Vaults
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year20222025
Websiteredstone.financehyperbloom.xyz
Twitter@redstone_defi@hyperbloomxyz
GitHubNot publicNot public
Verified✓ VerifiedUnverified
Tags
oracleHyperStoneprice-feedsHIP-3
DEX-aggregatoryieldautocompounding

Score Comparison

RedStoneHyperbloom
Open Source
RedStone
Not public
Hyperbloom
Not public
Verified
RedStone
Verified
Hyperbloom
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
RedStone
4 tags
Hyperbloom
3 tags
Maturity
RedStone
Since 2022
Hyperbloom
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureRedStone logoRedStoneHyperbloom logoHyperbloom
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

RedStone operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Hyperbloom runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

RedStone is focused on oracles, while Hyperbloom targets yield & vaults. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Unique Features

RedStone is distinguished by: oracle, HyperStone, price-feeds, HIP-3. Hyperbloom stands out with: DEX-aggregator, yield, autocompounding.

Market Timing

RedStone launched first in 2022, giving it a head start. Hyperbloom entered later in 2025, potentially with the benefit of learning from earlier entrants.

When to Use Each

Choose RedStone if you...

  • Want a oracles solution on Multi-Layer
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like oracle and HyperStone
  • Need: Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM

Choose Hyperbloom if you...

  • Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like DEX-aggregator and yield
  • Need: DEX aggregator and autocompounding yield optimizer

Ecosystem Integration

RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Hyperbloom logo

Hyperbloom

Hyperbloom operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with RedStone or Hyperbloom to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons