PERP.WIKI

RedStone vs NAVI Protocol

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Oracles

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus AreasVerified: RedStone

Quick Take

RedStone Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while NAVI Protocol Aave-inspired pooled lending and borrowing native to HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for RedStone and NAVI Protocol. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone is a modular blockchain oracle network that has become the dominant oracle solution on Hyperliquid, operating under the HyperStone brand for the ecosystem. Oracles are critical infrastructure — they provide smart contracts with real-world price feeds, enabling DeFi lending, derivatives, and synthetic assets to function correctly. RedStone's architecture is uniquely well-suited to Hyperliquid's high-performance environment: rather than pushing price updates to the chain on every tick (a costly approach), RedStone uses a pull-based model where data is fetched on-demand and cryptographically verified on-chain, dramatically reducing costs while maintaining freshness and accuracy. Securing approximately 99.5% of oracle-protected value on Hyperliquid, HyperStone feeds power a wide range of DeFi protocols on HyperEVM — from lending markets to perpetual protocols and yield vaults. RedStone aggregates price data from dozens of sources, applying outlier filtering and cryptographic attestation to ensure data integrity. With support for hundreds of assets and sub-second update latency, HyperStone gives Hyperliquid's DeFi ecosystem enterprise-grade price feeds, enabling complex financial products to be built with confidence in the underlying data infrastructure.

Visit website
NAVI Protocol logo

NAVI Protocol

NAVI Protocol is a leading decentralized liquidity protocol bringing efficient lending and borrowing infrastructure to the HyperEVM ecosystem, modeled after battle-tested money market designs like Aave v3. NAVI enables permissionless money markets where users can supply assets to earn yield and borrow against their collateral with transparent, algorithmically determined interest rates. The protocol supports a broad range of assets including HYPE the native Hyperliquid token, stablecoins USDC and USDT, ETH, and bridged tokens from Ethereum and other chains. Each asset has dedicated supply and borrow pools with utilization-based interest rate models: as demand for borrowing increases relative to available supply, borrow rates rise automatically to attract more depositors and moderate borrowing activity, maintaining stable pool utilization and ensuring lenders are compensated fairly for deployed capital. NAVI collateral management framework allows users to supply multiple assets as collateral simultaneously and borrow against a blended LTV ratio, enabling more capital-efficient borrowing positions compared to single-collateral models. The protocol risk parameters including loan-to-value ratios, liquidation thresholds, and liquidation bonuses are calibrated per asset based on liquidity, volatility, and oracle reliability. For HyperEVM DeFi participants, NAVI opens up a range of leveraged strategies: borrowing stablecoins against HYPE collateral to deploy into yield farms, leveraging up ETH positions, or accessing working capital without selling underlying assets. Borrowed funds can be deployed directly into Hyperliquid spot markets and DEXes, creating a tightly integrated leverage loop within the HyperEVM DeFi ecosystem. NAVI liquidation engine incentivizes third-party liquidators to maintain protocol health by allowing them to repay undercollateralized debt in exchange for discounted collateral. This decentralized liquidation model ensures the protocol can handle rapid market moves without centralized operators, maintaining solvency across all market conditions. The protocol features a governance token enabling community-driven upgrades to risk parameters, supported assets, and protocol fees. With a clean UI, clear risk disclosures, and integration with leading HyperEVM wallets, NAVI is accessible to both retail DeFi participants seeking stablecoin yield and institutional players using borrowing as a sophisticated portfolio management tool.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureRedStone logoRedStoneNAVI Protocol logoNAVI Protocol
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryOraclesLending & Borrowing
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2022
Websiteredstone.financenaviprotocol.io
Twitter@redstone_defi
GitHubNot publicNot public
Verified✓ VerifiedUnverified
Tags
oracleHyperStoneprice-feedsHIP-3

Score Comparison

RedStoneNAVI Protocol
Open Source
RedStone
Not public
NAVI Protocol
Not public
Verified
RedStone
Verified
NAVI Protocol
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
RedStone
4 tags
NAVI Protocol
0 tags
Maturity
RedStone
Since 2022
NAVI Protocol
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureRedStone logoRedStoneNAVI Protocol logoNAVI Protocol
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

RedStone is focused on oracles, while NAVI Protocol targets lending & borrowing. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose RedStone if you...

  • Want a oracles solution on Multi-Layer
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like oracle and HyperStone
  • Need: Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM

Choose NAVI Protocol if you...

  • Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Aave-inspired pooled lending and borrowing native to HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

NAVI Protocol logo

NAVI Protocol

NAVI Protocol operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with RedStone or NAVI Protocol to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons