PERP.WIKI

Sentiment vs Zellic

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing

Best for Borrowers
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Sentiment Leverage lending protocol on HyperEVM — perp positions as collateral on HyperEVM, while Zellic Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Sentiment and Zellic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Sentiment logo

Sentiment

Sentiment is a next-generation DeFi lending protocol on HyperEVM, designed to give borrowers greater capital flexibility through isolated lending pools and an account-based credit architecture. Traditional lending protocols force users into rigid, overcollateralized positions with global risk parameters that constrain innovation and limit asset diversity. Sentiment breaks this mold by introducing isolated risk environments where each pool operates independently, containing risk exposure without preventing new markets from forming. Borrowers access credit across multiple asset types through a unified account abstraction layer, enabling sophisticated DeFi strategies like leveraged yield farming and cross-protocol composability. Lenders earn yield by supplying assets to pools that match their individual risk appetite. The isolated pool design means new assets can be listed and deprecated without systemic contagion — making Sentiment far more adaptive than monolithic lending markets. On HyperEVM, Sentiment benefits from Hyperliquid's high throughput and low transaction costs, enabling frequent position management that would be prohibitively expensive on mainnet Ethereum. As HyperEVM's DeFi ecosystem expands, Sentiment provides the critical credit infrastructure that traders and protocols depend on for efficient, flexible capital deployment.

Visit website
Zellic logo

Zellic

Zellic is a rapidly growing blockchain security firm that combines deep smart contract expertise with strong cryptographic and systems security knowledge, serving protocols across EVM ecosystems including HyperEVM. Founded by top competitive CTF players, Zellic's team brings an attacker's mindset to every engagement, proactively identifying vulnerabilities in complex DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, and financial primitives. Zellic has audited hundreds of millions in TVL across lending protocols, DEXes, and infrastructure projects—many architecturally similar to what is being built on Hyperliquid. Their reports are known for clear vulnerability disclosure with actionable remediation guidance. For HyperEVM projects seeking an audit firm with fresh perspectives and a strong track record in cutting-edge DeFi security research, Zellic provides rigorous assessment that complements the traditional audit landscape and has earned a reputation as one of the most thorough firms for complex protocol reviews.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureSentiment logoSentimentZellic logoZellic
LayerHyperEVMMulti-Layer
CategoryLending & BorrowingSecurity & Audits
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitesentiment.xyzzellic.io
Twitter@sentimentxyz
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
lendingisolated-poolsperp-collateral

Score Comparison

SentimentZellic
Open Source
Sentiment
Not public
Zellic
Not public
Verified
Sentiment
Unverified
Zellic
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Sentiment
3 tags
Zellic
0 tags
Maturity
Sentiment
Since 2025
Zellic
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureSentiment logoSentimentZellic logoZellic
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Sentiment operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while Zellic runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Sentiment is focused on lending & borrowing, while Zellic targets security & audits. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Sentiment if you...

  • Want a lending & borrowing solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like lending and isolated-pools
  • Need: Leverage lending protocol on HyperEVM — perp positions as collateral

Choose Zellic if you...

  • Want a security & audits solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise

Ecosystem Integration

Sentiment logo

Sentiment

Sentiment operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Zellic logo

Zellic

Zellic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Sentiment or Zellic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons