Silo Finance vs LiquidSwap
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Lending & Borrowing
Best for BorrowersQuick Take
Silo Finance Isolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while LiquidSwap DEX aggregator spanning HyperEVM and HyperCore on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Silo Finance and LiquidSwap. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Silo Finance
Multi-LayerIsolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM
silo.financeLiquidSwap
Multi-LayerDEX aggregator spanning HyperEVM and HyperCore
liqd.agOverview
Silo Finance
Silo Finance is an isolated lending market protocol where each asset gets its own lending silo, ensuring that a compromise in one market cannot cascade to others. By pairing each asset with a bridge asset (ETH or stablecoins), Silo achieves risk isolation while maintaining capital efficiency for borrowers. This architecture is particularly valuable on HyperEVM where newer Hyperliquid spot tokens carry varying risk profiles. Silo v2 introduces permissionless market creation with configurable interest rate models and liquidation mechanisms, enabling any project to deploy a lending market for their token on Hyperliquid. The protocol's battle-tested security model and isolation-first design make it attractive for long-tail asset markets that larger monolithic protocols cannot safely support. Silo's architecture allows the Hyperliquid ecosystem to support lending for any HIP-1 token without threatening the security of other markets.
Visit websiteLiquidSwap
LiquidSwap, built by Liquid Labs, is a DEX aggregator on the Hyperliquid ecosystem that routes swaps across both HyperEVM decentralized exchanges and HyperCore's native order-book liquidity to guarantee users the best available price for every trade. Most DeFi aggregators operate within a single execution layer, but LiquidSwap's cross-layer architecture bridges the gap between HyperEVM's AMM-based DEXs and HyperCore's high-performance central limit order book — giving traders unified, one-click access to the deepest combined liquidity pool in the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Smart routing logic splits and sizes orders across multiple venues when beneficial, reducing price impact on larger trades and consistently capturing better execution than any single DEX could provide. Liquid Labs designed LiquidSwap to serve as the default swap infrastructure layer for HyperEVM users, abstracting away the complexity of choosing between trading venues, managing slippage, and navigating the boundary between execution environments. The result is a seamless, low-friction trading experience that competes on both price and speed — well-suited to a chain where ultra-low latency and high throughput are first-class features of the underlying architecture.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Lending & Borrowing | Decentralized Exchanges |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | silo.finance | liqd.ag |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | DEX-aggregatorroutingcross-layer |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Silo Finance is focused on lending & borrowing, while LiquidSwap targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Silo Finance if you...
- ✓Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Isolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM
Choose LiquidSwap if you...
- ✓Want a decentralized exchanges solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need features like DEX-aggregator and routing
- ✓Need: DEX aggregator spanning HyperEVM and HyperCore
Ecosystem Integration
Silo Finance
Silo Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
LiquidSwap
LiquidSwap operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Silo Finance or LiquidSwap to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category