PERP.WIKI

Tempest Finance vs Katoshi

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Yield & Vaults

Best for Yield
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Tempest Finance Automated yield vaults native to the HyperEVM ecosystem on Multi-Layer, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Tempest Finance and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Tempest Finance logo

Tempest Finance

Tempest Finance is a yield vault protocol native to the HyperEVM ecosystem, offering automated strategies for Hyperliquid users to earn passive income on their assets. Tempest deploys capital into optimized DeFi strategies spanning liquidity provision, lending, and perps trading—all within the Hyperliquid network. Its vaults abstract away the complexity of multi-protocol yield farming, allowing users to access diversified yield with a single deposit. Tempest's strategy engine dynamically allocates capital based on current yields, gas costs, and risk-adjusted returns, continuously rebalancing to maintain optimal performance. With a focus on native HyperEVM integrations and composability with Hyperliquid's spot and perp markets, Tempest is emerging as a core yield layer for HYPE holders and Hyperliquid DeFi participants who want to put their assets to work without active management or deep technical knowledge of multi-protocol interactions.

Visit website
Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureTempest Finance logoTempest FinanceKatoshi logoKatoshi
LayerMulti-LayerHyperCore
CategoryYield & VaultsTrading Bots & Automation
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitetempestfinance.xyzkatoshi.ai
Twitter@KatoshiAI
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial

Score Comparison

Tempest FinanceKatoshi
Open Source
Tempest Finance
Not public
Katoshi
Not public
Verified
Tempest Finance
Unverified
Katoshi
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Tempest Finance
0 tags
Katoshi
4 tags
Maturity
Tempest Finance
Unknown
Katoshi
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureTempest Finance logoTempest FinanceKatoshi logoKatoshi
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Tempest Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Tempest Finance is focused on yield & vaults, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Tempest Finance if you...

  • Want a yield & vaults solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Automated yield vaults native to the HyperEVM ecosystem

Choose Katoshi if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
  • Need features like AI and automation
  • Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid

Ecosystem Integration

Tempest Finance logo

Tempest Finance

Tempest Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Katoshi logo

Katoshi

Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Tempest Finance or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons