Zellic vs Katoshi
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Security & Audits
Ecosystem PickQuick Take
Zellic Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise on Multi-Layer, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Zellic and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Zellic
Multi-LayerRising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise
zellic.io
Katoshi
HyperCoreAI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
katoshi.aiOverview
Zellic
Zellic is a rapidly growing blockchain security firm that combines deep smart contract expertise with strong cryptographic and systems security knowledge, serving protocols across EVM ecosystems including HyperEVM. Founded by top competitive CTF players, Zellic's team brings an attacker's mindset to every engagement, proactively identifying vulnerabilities in complex DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, and financial primitives. Zellic has audited hundreds of millions in TVL across lending protocols, DEXes, and infrastructure projects—many architecturally similar to what is being built on Hyperliquid. Their reports are known for clear vulnerability disclosure with actionable remediation guidance. For HyperEVM projects seeking an audit firm with fresh perspectives and a strong track record in cutting-edge DeFi security research, Zellic provides rigorous assessment that complements the traditional audit landscape and has earned a reputation as one of the most thorough firms for complex protocol reviews.
Visit websiteKatoshi
Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperCore |
| Category | Security & Audits | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | zellic.io | katoshi.ai |
| — | @KatoshiAI | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Zellic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Zellic is focused on security & audits, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Zellic if you...
- ✓Want a security & audits solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise
Choose Katoshi if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like AI and automation
- ✓Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
Ecosystem Integration
Zellic
Zellic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Katoshi
Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Zellic or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category