What Is HIP-3? Permissionless Perp Markets Explained
How HIP-3 lets anyone create perpetual futures markets on Hyperliquid — from stocks to prediction markets.
What Is HIP-3?
HIP-3 is a Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal that enables permissionless perpetual futures markets on the Hyperliquid L1. Before HIP-3, only the Hyperliquid team could list new perpetual contracts. HIP-3 changes this by allowing anyone to create a perpetual futures market for any asset — as long as they meet the economic requirements.
Think of HIP-3 as the "Uniswap moment" for perpetual futures. Just as Uniswap allowed anyone to create a token trading pair, HIP-3 allows anyone to create a leveraged perpetual market. The difference is that these markets run on Hyperliquid's native order book with sub-second execution, not on a slow AMM.
This is a profound primitive. Perpetual futures are the most traded instrument in crypto, and HIP-3 makes them permissionless. Prediction markets, stock perpetuals, commodity perps, meme coin perps, and entirely novel financial products can all be built using HIP-3 without permission from anyone.
How It Works
To launch a HIP-3 market, a deployer must purchase a "ticker" — a unique identifier for the perpetual contract. Ticker purchases require a significant HYPE bond (currently around 500,000 HYPE), which serves as an economic commitment to prevent spam and ensure market quality. This bond can be crowdfunded through platforms like Kinetiq's Launch feature.
Once a ticker is acquired, the deployer configures the market parameters: the underlying asset, the oracle source, maximum leverage, and initial margin requirements. The market then goes live on HyperCore's native order book with the same matching engine, speed, and liquidity infrastructure as any other Hyperliquid perpetual.
The oracle system is flexible. HIP-3 markets can use Hyperliquid's native oracle, external price feeds, or custom oracle implementations. This flexibility is what enables non-crypto assets — the oracle just needs to provide a reliable price feed for whatever the underlying asset is.
The Economics
HIP-3 introduces a revenue-sharing model between the protocol and market deployers. Trading fees generated on a HIP-3 market are split — a portion goes to the deployer (as an incentive for creating valuable markets) and a portion flows to the protocol and HYPE stakers.
The ticker bond serves multiple purposes: it prevents spam listings, it ensures the deployer has economic skin in the game, and it creates demand for HYPE tokens. The bond is not burned — it is locked while the market is active, creating a form of productive staking. If a market becomes inactive, the deployer can reclaim the bond under certain conditions.
This economic model aligns incentives well. Market deployers are motivated to create markets that attract volume (because they earn fees), while the bond requirement ensures only serious deployers participate. Markets that fail to attract volume simply fade away, while successful ones become self-sustaining.
Use Cases
HIP-3 has unlocked several categories of markets that did not previously exist on-chain:
Stock perpetuals. Trade.xyz (HyperUnit) was the first project to purchase a HIP-3 ticker and has launched 24/7 perpetual trading for US stocks including Tesla, Apple, Nvidia, and a synthetic Nasdaq index. This means anyone in the world can gain leveraged exposure to US equities without a brokerage account.
Prediction markets. HyperOdd builds leveraged prediction markets on HIP-3, allowing users to trade on political, sports, and economic outcomes with up to 20x leverage. Unlike traditional prediction markets where positions are binary, HIP-3 perps allow continuous price discovery.
Pre-IPO markets. Ventuals creates perpetual markets for pre-IPO company valuations, letting users trade implied valuations of companies like SpaceX and OpenAI before they go public.
RWA perpetuals. Beyond stocks, HIP-3 enables perpetual markets for commodities, forex, interest rates, and other real-world assets. Any asset with a reliable price feed can be turned into a perpetual market.
Live HIP-3 Projects
The HIP-3 ecosystem is still young but growing rapidly. The most notable projects include:
Trade.xyz (HyperUnit) — the highest-volume HIP-3 market, processing over $500M in daily stock perp volume. They were the first to purchase a HIP-3 ticker (XYZ100) and have demonstrated that real-world asset perpetuals can achieve significant liquidity.
HyperOdd — the first leveraged prediction market on Hyperliquid, born from a community hackathon. Uses SEDA-powered Polymarket data feeds and Privy for account abstraction.
Ventuals — pre-IPO perpetuals with a unique hybrid oracle system. Self-funded through a community NFT mint rather than VC funding.
Risks and Limitations
HIP-3 markets carry risks beyond standard perp trading. Oracle quality varies between markets — a poorly configured oracle can lead to unfair liquidations or price manipulation. Unlike core Hyperliquid markets that have deep institutional liquidity, HIP-3 markets may have thinner order books, especially in their early days.
The 500,000 HYPE bond requirement is substantial, which limits who can deploy markets. While crowdfunding through Kinetiq's Launch platform makes this more accessible, it still represents a significant barrier. This is by design — it prevents spam — but it also means potentially valuable niche markets may not get created.
Regulatory risk is heightened for HIP-3 markets that track real-world securities. Stock perpetuals exist in a legal gray zone, and their long-term regulatory status is uncertain. Users trading these products should understand that regulations could change.
The Future of HIP-3
HIP-3 is still in its early stages, and the design space it opens is enormous. As oracle infrastructure matures and liquidity deepens, expect to see markets for increasingly exotic underlyings: weather derivatives, carbon credits, sports outcome perpetuals, and financial instruments that do not exist in traditional markets.
The combination of permissionless market creation, sub-second execution, and leverage creates a powerful primitive. HIP-3 may ultimately be the feature that most clearly differentiates Hyperliquid from every other blockchain — not just another DEX, but a platform for creating any financial market, without permission.
Current HIP-3 Markets
The HIP-3 market landscape has expanded rapidly since the standard launched, and the diversity of what is being traded on permissionless Hyperliquid perps is already remarkable. These markets cover assets that would have been unthinkable on-chain just a year ago — US equities, political outcomes, pre-IPO valuations, and volatility indices — all trading 24/7 on a decentralized order book with leverage.
Trade.xyz Stock Perpetuals. Trade.xyz (formerly HyperUnit) is the clear volume leader among HIP-3 deployers, consistently processing over $500M in daily volume across its stock perpetual markets. Their listed markets include TSLA (Tesla), AAPL (Apple), NVDA (Nvidia), AMZN (Amazon), and a synthetic Nasdaq composite index that tracks the overall US tech sector. These markets trade around the clock — unlike traditional stock exchanges that close at 4 PM Eastern — meaning a trader in Singapore can take a leveraged position on Tesla at 3 AM New York time. The price feeds are derived from a combination of real-time equity data providers and after-hours pricing models, ensuring that the perpetual price tracks the underlying equity as closely as possible even when the NYSE is closed.
HyperOdd Prediction Markets. HyperOdd has carved out a unique niche by bringing leveraged prediction markets to Hyperliquid. Unlike Polymarket, where positions are binary (yes/no shares at a fixed price), HyperOdd uses HIP-3 perpetual contracts to enable continuous price discovery on outcomes. Their markets span sports events (Super Bowl outcomes, NBA playoffs, Premier League matches), crypto-native events (ETF approvals, protocol launches, chain milestones), and political events (election outcomes, policy decisions). The ability to apply up to 20x leverage to prediction market positions is novel — it means a trader who is highly convicted on an outcome can express that conviction with concentrated capital rather than tying up large amounts in a binary market.
Ventuals Pre-IPO Perpetuals. Ventuals creates markets for companies that have not yet gone public, allowing traders to speculate on implied valuations of private companies. Current markets include SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, and other high-profile private tech companies. The oracle challenge here is significant — there is no public market price for a pre-IPO company — so Ventuals uses a hybrid oracle system that combines secondary market transaction data, analyst estimates, and proprietary valuation models to produce a reference price. These markets are inherently less liquid than stock perps due to the subjective nature of the underlying, but they fill a real gap: before Ventuals, there was no easy way for retail investors to get exposure to pre-IPO company valuations.
Volmex Volatility Indices. Volmex has deployed HIP-3 markets for crypto volatility indices — BVIV (Bitcoin Implied Volatility Index) and EVIV (Ethereum Implied Volatility Index). These function as the crypto equivalent of the VIX, the traditional finance fear gauge that measures expected volatility in the S&P 500. The Volmex indices are calculated from options market data across multiple exchanges, providing a single number that represents the market's expectation of future price swings. Traders use these markets to hedge portfolio volatility, speculate on regime changes in market conditions, or express views on whether crypto markets will be calm or turbulent over a given period. Volatility perpetuals are a sophisticated instrument that previously existed only on centralized derivatives platforms — their presence on HIP-3 demonstrates the standard's flexibility.
HIP-3 vs Traditional Perps
While HIP-3 markets share the same order book infrastructure as Hyperliquid's core perpetual markets, there are important structural differences that traders should understand before participating. These differences affect liquidity, risk parameters, and the overall trading experience.
Collateral requirements work differently for HIP-3 markets. For core Hyperliquid perps (BTC, ETH, SOL, etc.), the protocol itself backstops the market infrastructure. For HIP-3 markets, the deployer provides the initial economic commitment in the form of a HYPE bond. This bond serves as a form of skin-in-the-game that aligns the deployer's incentives with the market's success, but it also means that the deployer — not the protocol — bears the primary economic risk of the market's viability.
HLP participation is not guaranteed on HIP-3 markets. The HLP vault, which acts as the primary market maker on core Hyperliquid perps, may or may not provide liquidity on HIP-3 markets depending on the market's configuration and the HLP strategy's risk parameters. Some high-volume HIP-3 markets (like Trade.xyz's stock perps) do receive HLP liquidity, but many newer or lower-volume HIP-3 markets rely entirely on independent market makers for order book depth. This means spreads can be wider and slippage can be higher, particularly for large orders or during volatile periods.
Oracle sources vary significantly between HIP-3 markets and core perps. Core Hyperliquid perps use a standardized oracle system that aggregates prices from multiple centralized exchanges (Binance, OKX, Bybit, etc.) to produce a robust spot index price. HIP-3 markets, by contrast, can use custom oracle implementations tailored to their specific underlying asset. A stock perp might use equity market data feeds, a prediction market might use event outcome data from Polymarket, and a volatility index might use options pricing models. This flexibility enables the breadth of HIP-3 markets, but it also means oracle quality is not uniform — some oracles are more robust than others, and traders should evaluate the oracle source before taking large positions.
Leverage limits are generally lower on HIP-3 markets compared to core perps. While core BTC and ETH perps offer up to 50x leverage, HIP-3 markets typically launch with lower default limits — often 5x to 20x depending on the deployer's configuration and the underlying asset's volatility. This is a sensible risk management measure: a stock perp or prediction market may have different volatility characteristics than a major crypto asset, and higher leverage could lead to excessive liquidations and bad debt.
The Economics of Listing
Deploying a HIP-3 market is a significant economic undertaking, and understanding the full cost structure is essential for anyone considering it. The bond requirement alone makes HIP-3 deployment inaccessible to casual participants — which is exactly the intended design.
The primary cost is the HYPE bond, currently set at approximately 500,000 HYPE. At prevailing prices of roughly $30 per HYPE, this represents a commitment of over $15 million in value. This is not a fee that gets consumed — the bond is locked, not burned. The HYPE remains the property of the deployer (or the crowdfunding participants), and it can be reclaimed if the market is decommissioned. However, while the market is active, the bond is illiquid — it cannot be traded, staked, or used as collateral elsewhere.
For popular tickers — ones that multiple parties want to deploy — Hyperliquid uses a Dutch auction mechanism. The ticker price starts high and decreases over time until a buyer accepts. This prevents front-running and ensures that tickers go to deployers who value them most (and presumably have the best plans for generating volume). The Dutch auction has produced some notable outcomes: highly sought-after tickers for major assets have sold at significant premiums above the base bond requirement, while niche tickers have gone for closer to the floor.
The revenue side of the equation comes from the fee split. Trading fees generated on a HIP-3 market are divided between the deployer and the protocol. The deployer's share provides ongoing revenue that can recoup the bond opportunity cost over time. A high-volume market like Trade.xyz's stock perps, generating $500M+ in daily volume, earns substantial deployer fees — enough to justify the bond many times over. A low-volume niche market, by contrast, may never generate enough fees to offset the capital locked in the bond.
Kinetiq's Launch platform has emerged as the primary solution for the accessibility problem. Kinetiq offers "Exchange as a Service" (EaaS) — a crowdfunding mechanism where multiple participants pool HYPE to collectively fund a ticker bond. In exchange, contributors receive a proportional share of the deployer fees generated by the market. This model has democratized HIP-3 deployment, allowing markets to launch that no single entity would have funded alone. It has also created a new asset class of sorts: shares in HIP-3 market fee streams, which function somewhat like equity in a mini-exchange.
The bond lock mechanism also creates interesting game theory. Because the bond is locked rather than burned, deployers have a long-term stake in their market's success. Abandoning a market means leaving a large amount of HYPE locked indefinitely (or at least until the reclaim conditions are met), creating a strong incentive to maintain oracle quality, promote the market, and attract traders. This is a more sustainable incentive structure than burning fees, which would provide no ongoing motivation for the deployer after launch.
Risks Specific to HIP-3
While the earlier risks section covered the general limitations of HIP-3, traders should be aware of several additional risk factors that are specific to the permissionless nature of these markets. These risks do not apply (or apply to a much lesser degree) to Hyperliquid's core perpetual markets.
Lower liquidity is the most immediate practical risk. Core Hyperliquid perps for major assets like BTC and ETH have deep order books with millions of dollars within a few basis points of the mid price. HIP-3 markets, particularly newer ones, may have order books that are orders of magnitude thinner. This means larger trades can experience significant slippage, and market orders during volatile periods can fill at prices far from the displayed price. Traders should always check order book depth before sizing a position on a HIP-3 market, and consider using limit orders rather than market orders to control execution price.
Oracle quality varies significantly across HIP-3 markets, and this variation introduces risks that do not exist on core perps. A stock perp oracle might rely on a single equity data provider — if that provider experiences downtime or delivers incorrect data, the perpetual price can diverge from the true underlying price, leading to unfair liquidations or arbitrage opportunities that come at the expense of regular traders. Prediction market oracles face an even harder challenge: determining the outcome of an event requires a resolution mechanism, and disputes about resolution can create chaos in the market. Custom oracles built by deployers may not have the same redundancy and error-handling as Hyperliquid's native oracle system.
Regulatory risk is heightened for certain categories of HIP-3 markets. Stock perpetuals, in particular, exist in a regulatory gray area. Offering leveraged synthetic exposure to US equities without a securities license is, at minimum, a novel legal question. Different jurisdictions will likely reach different conclusions, and enforcement actions against similar products (both in crypto and traditional finance) are not without precedent. Sports prediction markets face their own regulatory challenges, as online sports betting is heavily regulated or outright banned in many jurisdictions. Political prediction markets have their own legal complexities, as recent CFTC guidance in the United States has shown. Traders should understand the legal status of these products in their jurisdiction.
Deployer abandonment risk is a concern unique to permissionless markets. If a deployer loses interest in maintaining their market — stops updating the oracle, stops promoting the market, or simply disappears — the market can degrade. An unmaintained oracle might stop updating, causing the perpetual price to stale and creating liquidation risk for traders with open positions. While the locked bond provides some incentive against abandonment, if the bond value drops below the cost of maintenance (or if the deployer simply does not care about recovering it), abandonment is possible. Traders should assess deployer credibility and track record before committing significant capital to a HIP-3 market, just as they would evaluate the team behind any other crypto project.
Counterparty concentration is another factor. In a thin HIP-3 market, it is possible for a small number of traders to represent the majority of open interest. This creates manipulation risk — a large trader could potentially move the price of a low-liquidity HIP-3 perp by placing outsized orders, triggering stop losses or liquidations of other participants. The JELLY incident on core Hyperliquid (which led to market delisting) demonstrated that this type of manipulation is a real concern even on more liquid markets, and the risk is amplified on thinner HIP-3 books.
Related Articles
Ready to explore Protocol?
Browse projects, compare protocols, and dive deeper into the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Bookmark perp.wiki for the latest Hyperliquid ecosystem coverage.