3Commas vs Panoptic
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
3Commas Cloud-based trading automation platform with Hyperliquid bot support on Multi-Layer, while Panoptic Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for 3Commas and Panoptic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
3Commas
Multi-LayerCloud-based trading automation platform with Hyperliquid bot support
3commas.ioPanoptic
Multi-LayerPerpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs
panoptic.xyzOverview
3Commas
3Commas is a leading cloud-based crypto trading automation platform supporting Hyperliquid alongside 20+ major exchanges. Its user-friendly interface lets traders configure DCA bots, Grid bots, and Options bots without writing any code, bringing algorithmic trading accessibility to retail users. On Hyperliquid, 3Commas bots can execute DCA accumulation strategies, grid-trade perpetual futures, and manage portfolio rebalancing automatically. The platform's SmartTrade terminal provides advanced order types including trailing stop-loss, take-profit chains, and conditional orders that enhance Hyperliquid's native order types. With portfolio analytics, signal marketplace, and copy-trading features, 3Commas is a comprehensive automation ecosystem for traders who want institutional-grade strategy execution on Hyperliquid without deep technical knowledge. The platform's non-custodial model using API keys ensures users retain custody of funds while enabling automation.
Visit websitePanoptic
Panoptic is a groundbreaking perpetual options protocol built on Uniswap v3-style liquidity positions, enabling the permissionless creation and trading of any-strike, any-expiry options on any EVM token pair without the need for a traditional order book, options clearing house, or centralized counterparty. It represents one of the most technically sophisticated options primitives in DeFi, redefining how on-chain options are structured and priced. The protocol core insight is that Uniswap v3 concentrated liquidity positions are structurally equivalent to short-options payoff profiles. By reinterpreting and tokenizing these LP positions as options contracts, Panoptic enables traders to buy and sell calls and puts permissionlessly on any Uniswap v3 pool. Options sellers provide liquidity and collect streaming fees continuously, while options buyers pay a streaming premium instead of an upfront cost, eliminating the need for expiry dates and simplifying options mechanics for DeFi users. Panoptic supports multi-leg options strategies including spreads, straddles, strangles, and condors, all composable and expressible within a single transaction. This brings institutional-grade options strategy construction to DeFi for the first time in a fully on-chain, non-custodial format. On HyperEVM, where Uniswap v3-compatible concentrated liquidity DEXes are deploying, Panoptic enables sophisticated options trading on Hyperliquid spot assets. Options traders can express views on BTC, ETH, HYPE, and other assets with defined risk profiles, hedging perpetual positions or speculating on volatility surfaces. This complementary options layer adds significant depth to Hyperliquid existing perpetuals infrastructure. The protocol fee structure is directly linked to Uniswap v3 pool fee tiers of 0.05%, 0.30%, and 1.00%, and all pricing is derived from on-chain LP data, making Panoptic fully oracle-free and resistant to price manipulation. Liquidations are handled through a force-exercise mechanism that incentivizes third parties to close at-risk positions without centralized liquidators. Panoptic is targeted at experienced DeFi traders, options market makers, and quant funds seeking to build options books on-chain. Its gas-efficient design, deep Uniswap v3 integration, and novel streaming premium model make it one of the most technically innovative derivatives protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Decentralized Exchanges |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | 3commas.io | panoptic.xyz |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
3Commas is focused on trading bots & automation, while Panoptic targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose 3Commas if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Cloud-based trading automation platform with Hyperliquid bot support
Choose Panoptic if you...
- ✓Want a decentralized exchanges solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs
Ecosystem Integration
3Commas
3Commas operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Panoptic
Panoptic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with 3Commas or Panoptic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category