PERP.WIKI

Backed Finance vs Dynamic

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · RWA Perps

Best for Traders
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Backed Finance Swiss-regulated tokenized stocks and bonds for on-chain RWA exposure on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Backed Finance and Dynamic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Backed Finance logo

Backed Finance

Backed Finance is a Swiss-regulated issuer of on-chain tokens backed 1:1 by real-world financial assets including US Treasury bonds, equity ETFs, and individual company stocks. Backed's bTokens are fully transferable ERC-20 tokens that track the price of their underlying TradFi asset, enabling DeFi protocols on HyperEVM to offer exposure to traditional financial markets within their yield strategies and collateral frameworks. For Hyperliquid's RWA perps vision, Backed provides the underlying tokenized assets that power perpetual trading on real-world equities and bonds directly on-chain. Backed's regulatory compliance in Switzerland ensures that institutional participants can interact with these tokens in a legally compliant manner, bridging the gap between TradFi and the Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Its transparent reserve model and regular audits provide confidence for protocols that wish to use tokenized stocks as collateral or reference assets for derivatives.

Visit website
Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureBacked Finance logoBacked FinanceDynamic logoDynamic
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryRWA PerpsWallets & Account Abstraction
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitebackedassets.fidynamic.xyz
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

Backed FinanceDynamic
Open Source
Backed Finance
Not public
Dynamic
Not public
Verified
Backed Finance
Unverified
Dynamic
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Backed Finance
0 tags
Dynamic
0 tags
Maturity
Backed Finance
Unknown
Dynamic
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureBacked Finance logoBacked FinanceDynamic logoDynamic
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Backed Finance is focused on rwa perps, while Dynamic targets wallets & account abstraction. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Backed Finance if you...

  • Want a rwa perps solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Swiss-regulated tokenized stocks and bonds for on-chain RWA exposure on HyperEVM

Choose Dynamic if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding

Ecosystem Integration

Backed Finance logo

Backed Finance

Backed Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Backed Finance or Dynamic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons