Dune Analytics vs Dynamic
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data
Best for ResearchQuick Take
Dune Analytics Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem on Multi-Layer, while Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Dune Analytics and Dynamic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Dune Analytics
Multi-LayerCommunity-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem
dune.com
Dynamic
Multi-LayerDeveloper-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding
dynamic.xyzOverview
Dune Analytics
Dune Analytics is the leading community-powered blockchain data platform, where analysts write SQL queries against decoded on-chain data to build public dashboards—with a growing library of Hyperliquid-specific analytics. Hundreds of community-authored Dune dashboards track Hyperliquid metrics including total trading volume, open interest trends, liquidation waterfalls, fee revenue, top traders by P&L, and HLP vault performance. Dune's Spellbook framework enables reusable, cross-chain data models that standardize Hyperliquid data alongside Ethereum and Arbitrum metrics. For researchers, protocol teams, and investors, Dune provides free access to comprehensive Hyperliquid analytics without the need for custom indexing infrastructure. Its collaborative model means new Hyperliquid protocols can have community-built dashboards within days of launch, providing immediate transparency and accountability for the Hyperliquid ecosystem's growing DeFi activity.
Visit websiteDynamic
Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Analytics & Data | Wallets & Account Abstraction |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | dune.com | dynamic.xyz |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Dune Analytics is focused on analytics & data, while Dynamic targets wallets & account abstraction. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Dune Analytics if you...
- ✓Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Community-powered data dashboards for tracking the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem
Choose Dynamic if you...
- ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding
Ecosystem Integration
Dune Analytics
Dune Analytics operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Dynamic
Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Dune Analytics or Dynamic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category