PERP.WIKI

Dynamic vs HypurrScan

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer, while HypurrScan Hyperliquid L1 explorer — auctions, TWAPs, whales, and on-chain data on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Dynamic and HypurrScan. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.

Visit website
HypurrScan logo

HypurrScan

HypurrScan is the dedicated block explorer and analytics platform for Hyperliquid's Layer 1 blockchain, offering comprehensive visibility into the network's on-chain activity. Analogous to Etherscan for Ethereum, HypurrScan is purpose-built for Hyperliquid's unique architecture — a high-performance consensus layer that powers fully on-chain perpetual futures and spot order books with sub-second finality. The explorer provides real-time and historical tracking of transactions, wallet addresses, token balances, TWAP (time-weighted average price) executions, and HIP-1 token auction prices. Users can drill into individual accounts to view their full trading history, open positions, and asset holdings across both spot and perpetuals markets. HypurrScan also surfaces network-level statistics including validator activity, block production data, and ecosystem metrics essential for researchers, traders, and developers building on Hyperliquid L1. As the Hyperliquid ecosystem has scaled — with billions in daily trading volume and hundreds of perpetual markets — HypurrScan has become an indispensable transparency tool. Its dashboard aggregates the most critical L1 data into a single interface optimized for both casual users and power analysts navigating the HYPE ecosystem.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicHypurrScan logoHypurrScan
LayerMulti-LayerHyperCore
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionAnalytics & Data
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitedynamic.xyzhypurrscan.io
Twitter@HypurrScan
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
exploreranalyticswhaleson-chain

Score Comparison

DynamicHypurrScan
Open Source
Dynamic
Not public
HypurrScan
Not public
Verified
Dynamic
Unverified
HypurrScan
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Dynamic
0 tags
HypurrScan
4 tags
Maturity
Dynamic
Unknown
HypurrScan
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicHypurrScan logoHypurrScan
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while HypurrScan runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Dynamic is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while HypurrScan targets analytics & data. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Dynamic if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding

Choose HypurrScan if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on HyperCore
  • Need features like explorer and analytics
  • Need: Hyperliquid L1 explorer — auctions, TWAPs, whales, and on-chain data

Ecosystem Integration

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

HypurrScan logo

HypurrScan

HypurrScan operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Dynamic or HypurrScan to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons