PERP.WIKI

Dynamic vs Gauntlet

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer, while Gauntlet Financial risk modeling and protocol optimization for DeFi protocols on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Dynamic and Gauntlet. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.

Visit website

Gauntlet

Gauntlet is a financial risk management and protocol optimization platform that uses agent-based market simulations to stress-test DeFi protocols and optimize their economic parameters. As protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem scale their TVL in lending markets and liquidity vaults, Gauntlet's simulation engine models adversarial behaviors, market crashes, and oracle manipulation scenarios to identify parameter configurations that maximize capital efficiency while minimizing insolvency risk. Gauntlet provides ongoing risk management services—continuously updating protocol parameters like liquidation bonuses, borrow caps, and collateral ratios in response to changing market conditions. With a track record managing billions in risk across Aave, Compound, and other top DeFi protocols, Gauntlet brings institutional-grade risk science to the growing Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Protocols that engage Gauntlet signal commitment to sustainable, risk-managed growth rather than aggressive TVL maximization at the expense of security.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicGauntlet
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionAnalytics & Data
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitedynamic.xyzgauntlet.xyz
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

DynamicGauntlet
Open Source
Dynamic
Not public
Gauntlet
Not public
Verified
Dynamic
Unverified
Gauntlet
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Dynamic
0 tags
Gauntlet
0 tags
Maturity
Dynamic
Unknown
Gauntlet
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicGauntlet
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Dynamic is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Gauntlet targets analytics & data. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Dynamic if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding

Choose Gauntlet if you...

  • Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Financial risk modeling and protocol optimization for DeFi protocols on HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Gauntlet

Gauntlet operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Dynamic or Gauntlet to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons