Dynamic vs Silo Finance
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction
Ecosystem PickQuick Take
Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer, while Silo Finance Isolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Dynamic and Silo Finance. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Dynamic
Multi-LayerDeveloper-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding
dynamic.xyz
Silo Finance
Multi-LayerIsolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM
silo.financeOverview
Dynamic
Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.
Visit websiteSilo Finance
Silo Finance is an isolated lending market protocol where each asset gets its own lending silo, ensuring that a compromise in one market cannot cascade to others. By pairing each asset with a bridge asset (ETH or stablecoins), Silo achieves risk isolation while maintaining capital efficiency for borrowers. This architecture is particularly valuable on HyperEVM where newer Hyperliquid spot tokens carry varying risk profiles. Silo v2 introduces permissionless market creation with configurable interest rate models and liquidation mechanisms, enabling any project to deploy a lending market for their token on Hyperliquid. The protocol's battle-tested security model and isolation-first design make it attractive for long-tail asset markets that larger monolithic protocols cannot safely support. Silo's architecture allows the Hyperliquid ecosystem to support lending for any HIP-1 token without threatening the security of other markets.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Wallets & Account Abstraction | Lending & Borrowing |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | dynamic.xyz | silo.finance |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Dynamic is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Silo Finance targets lending & borrowing. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Dynamic if you...
- ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding
Choose Silo Finance if you...
- ✓Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Isolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM
Ecosystem Integration
Dynamic
Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Silo Finance
Silo Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Dynamic or Silo Finance to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category