PERP.WIKI

Dynamic vs Zellic

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Dynamic Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding on Multi-Layer, while Zellic Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Dynamic and Zellic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic is a powerful wallet and authentication infrastructure platform enabling Web3 developers building on HyperEVM to add multi-wallet login, embedded wallets, and progressive onboarding flows to their applications. Dynamic's SDK supports 300+ wallets including MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, and social login via Google and email, letting users connect to HyperEVM dApps via their preferred authentication method. Its embedded wallet feature provisions non-custodial wallets on behalf of users who do not have an existing wallet, seamlessly bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 onboarding. For HyperEVM applications targeting both crypto-native and mainstream audiences, Dynamic provides a flexible, developer-friendly SDK with built-in user management, passkey support, and multi-chain session handling—reducing weeks of auth development to hours. Dynamic is trusted by hundreds of Web3 projects globally and is a natural choice for ambitious HyperEVM applications.

Visit website
Zellic logo

Zellic

Zellic is a rapidly growing blockchain security firm that combines deep smart contract expertise with strong cryptographic and systems security knowledge, serving protocols across EVM ecosystems including HyperEVM. Founded by top competitive CTF players, Zellic's team brings an attacker's mindset to every engagement, proactively identifying vulnerabilities in complex DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, and financial primitives. Zellic has audited hundreds of millions in TVL across lending protocols, DEXes, and infrastructure projects—many architecturally similar to what is being built on Hyperliquid. Their reports are known for clear vulnerability disclosure with actionable remediation guidance. For HyperEVM projects seeking an audit firm with fresh perspectives and a strong track record in cutting-edge DeFi security research, Zellic provides rigorous assessment that complements the traditional audit landscape and has earned a reputation as one of the most thorough firms for complex protocol reviews.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicZellic logoZellic
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionSecurity & Audits
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitedynamic.xyzzellic.io
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

DynamicZellic
Open Source
Dynamic
Not public
Zellic
Not public
Verified
Dynamic
Unverified
Zellic
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Dynamic
0 tags
Zellic
0 tags
Maturity
Dynamic
Unknown
Zellic
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureDynamic logoDynamicZellic logoZellic
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Dynamic is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Zellic targets security & audits. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Dynamic if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Developer-friendly wallet and auth SDK enabling smooth HyperEVM dApp onboarding

Choose Zellic if you...

  • Want a security & audits solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Rising star blockchain security firm with deep DeFi and cryptography expertise

Ecosystem Integration

Dynamic logo

Dynamic

Dynamic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Zellic logo

Zellic

Zellic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Dynamic or Zellic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons