PERP.WIKI

Growi HF vs RedStone

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Yield & Vaults

Best for Yield
Different Focus AreasVerified: RedStone

Quick Take

Growi HF Quantitative DeFi hedge fund vault on Hyperliquid on HyperCore, while RedStone Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Growi HF and RedStone. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Growi HF logo

Growi HF

Growi HF is a quantitative asset management protocol built natively on Hyperliquid, offering permissionless strategy vaults powered by systematic, risk-adjusted trading algorithms. Designed for both passive investors and active DeFi participants, Growi HF eliminates the complexity of running sophisticated trading algorithms by packaging institutional-grade quant strategies into accessible on-chain vaults. Each vault employs distinct quantitative methodologies — from market-neutral delta strategies to momentum and mean-reversion approaches — all optimized for Hyperliquid's high-performance order book and deep liquidity. Traders benefit from transparent, fully on-chain execution with no hidden fees or centralized custody risks. By deploying directly on Hyperliquid's HyperCore, Growi HF's vaults access ultra-low latency trading infrastructure and some of the tightest spreads in decentralized perpetuals markets. Depositors earn yield proportional to vault performance, while the protocol automatically manages risk parameters including position sizing, drawdown limits, and rebalancing. Growi HF bridges institutional quantitative hedge fund methodology with the open, permissionless architecture of the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Visit website
RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone is a modular blockchain oracle network that has become the dominant oracle solution on Hyperliquid, operating under the HyperStone brand for the ecosystem. Oracles are critical infrastructure — they provide smart contracts with real-world price feeds, enabling DeFi lending, derivatives, and synthetic assets to function correctly. RedStone's architecture is uniquely well-suited to Hyperliquid's high-performance environment: rather than pushing price updates to the chain on every tick (a costly approach), RedStone uses a pull-based model where data is fetched on-demand and cryptographically verified on-chain, dramatically reducing costs while maintaining freshness and accuracy. Securing approximately 99.5% of oracle-protected value on Hyperliquid, HyperStone feeds power a wide range of DeFi protocols on HyperEVM — from lending markets to perpetual protocols and yield vaults. RedStone aggregates price data from dozens of sources, applying outlier filtering and cryptographic attestation to ensure data integrity. With support for hundreds of assets and sub-second update latency, HyperStone gives Hyperliquid's DeFi ecosystem enterprise-grade price feeds, enabling complex financial products to be built with confidence in the underlying data infrastructure.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrowi HF logoGrowi HFRedStone logoRedStone
LayerHyperCoreMulti-Layer
CategoryYield & VaultsOracles
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year20242022
Websitehf.growi.firedstone.finance
Twitter@GrowiFinance@redstone_defi
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverified✓ Verified
Tags
quanthedge-fundvaultrisk-adjusted
oracleHyperStoneprice-feedsHIP-3

Score Comparison

Growi HFRedStone
Open Source
Growi HF
Not public
RedStone
Not public
Verified
Growi HF
Unverified
RedStone
Verified
Ecosystem Breadth
Growi HF
4 tags
RedStone
4 tags
Maturity
Growi HF
Since 2024
RedStone
Since 2022

Feature Matrix

FeatureGrowi HF logoGrowi HFRedStone logoRedStone
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Growi HF operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook), while RedStone runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Growi HF is focused on yield & vaults, while RedStone targets oracles. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Unique Features

Growi HF is distinguished by: quant, hedge-fund, vault, risk-adjusted. RedStone stands out with: oracle, HyperStone, price-feeds, HIP-3.

Market Timing

RedStone launched first in 2022, giving it a head start. Growi HF entered later in 2024, potentially with the benefit of learning from earlier entrants.

When to Use Each

Choose Growi HF if you...

  • Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperCore
  • Need features like quant and hedge-fund
  • Need: Quantitative DeFi hedge fund vault on Hyperliquid

Choose RedStone if you...

  • Want a oracles solution on Multi-Layer
  • Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
  • Need features like oracle and HyperStone
  • Need: Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Growi HF logo

Growi HF

Growi HF operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.

RedStone logo

RedStone

RedStone operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Growi HF or RedStone to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons