Growi HF vs RedStone
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Yield & Vaults
Best for YieldQuick Take
Growi HF Quantitative DeFi hedge fund vault on Hyperliquid on HyperCore, while RedStone Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Growi HF and RedStone. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Growi HF
HyperCoreQuantitative DeFi hedge fund vault on Hyperliquid
hf.growi.fiRedStone
Multi-LayerOracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM
redstone.financeOverview
Growi HF
Growi HF is a quantitative asset management protocol built natively on Hyperliquid, offering permissionless strategy vaults powered by systematic, risk-adjusted trading algorithms. Designed for both passive investors and active DeFi participants, Growi HF eliminates the complexity of running sophisticated trading algorithms by packaging institutional-grade quant strategies into accessible on-chain vaults. Each vault employs distinct quantitative methodologies — from market-neutral delta strategies to momentum and mean-reversion approaches — all optimized for Hyperliquid's high-performance order book and deep liquidity. Traders benefit from transparent, fully on-chain execution with no hidden fees or centralized custody risks. By deploying directly on Hyperliquid's HyperCore, Growi HF's vaults access ultra-low latency trading infrastructure and some of the tightest spreads in decentralized perpetuals markets. Depositors earn yield proportional to vault performance, while the protocol automatically manages risk parameters including position sizing, drawdown limits, and rebalancing. Growi HF bridges institutional quantitative hedge fund methodology with the open, permissionless architecture of the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Visit websiteRedStone
RedStone is a modular blockchain oracle network that has become the dominant oracle solution on Hyperliquid, operating under the HyperStone brand for the ecosystem. Oracles are critical infrastructure — they provide smart contracts with real-world price feeds, enabling DeFi lending, derivatives, and synthetic assets to function correctly. RedStone's architecture is uniquely well-suited to Hyperliquid's high-performance environment: rather than pushing price updates to the chain on every tick (a costly approach), RedStone uses a pull-based model where data is fetched on-demand and cryptographically verified on-chain, dramatically reducing costs while maintaining freshness and accuracy. Securing approximately 99.5% of oracle-protected value on Hyperliquid, HyperStone feeds power a wide range of DeFi protocols on HyperEVM — from lending markets to perpetual protocols and yield vaults. RedStone aggregates price data from dozens of sources, applying outlier filtering and cryptographic attestation to ensure data integrity. With support for hundreds of assets and sub-second update latency, HyperStone gives Hyperliquid's DeFi ecosystem enterprise-grade price feeds, enabling complex financial products to be built with confidence in the underlying data infrastructure.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | HyperCore | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Yield & Vaults | Oracles |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2024 | 2022 |
| Website | hf.growi.fi | redstone.finance |
| @GrowiFinance | @redstone_defi | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | ✓ Verified |
| Tags | quanthedge-fundvaultrisk-adjusted | oracleHyperStoneprice-feedsHIP-3 |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Growi HF operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook), while RedStone runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Growi HF is focused on yield & vaults, while RedStone targets oracles. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Unique Features
Growi HF is distinguished by: quant, hedge-fund, vault, risk-adjusted. RedStone stands out with: oracle, HyperStone, price-feeds, HIP-3.
Market Timing
RedStone launched first in 2022, giving it a head start. Growi HF entered later in 2024, potentially with the benefit of learning from earlier entrants.
When to Use Each
Choose Growi HF if you...
- ✓Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like quant and hedge-fund
- ✓Need: Quantitative DeFi hedge fund vault on Hyperliquid
Choose RedStone if you...
- ✓Want a oracles solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
- ✓Need features like oracle and HyperStone
- ✓Need: Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM
Ecosystem Integration
Growi HF
Growi HF operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
RedStone
RedStone operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Growi HF or RedStone to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category