Hyperliquid Names vs Katoshi
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction
Ecosystem PickQuick Take
Hyperliquid Names .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem on HyperEVM, while Katoshi AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Hyperliquid Names and Katoshi. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Hyperliquid Names
HyperEVM.hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem
hlnames.xyzKatoshi
HyperCoreAI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
katoshi.aiOverview
Hyperliquid Names
Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.
Visit websiteKatoshi
Katoshi is the premier trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid, enabling traders to build, deploy, and manage algorithmic strategies with millisecond precision and zero downtime. Trusted by thousands of active traders, Katoshi abstracts the complexity of algorithmic execution into an accessible platform that requires no deep coding expertise. At its core, Katoshi offers a complete automation toolkit: receive signals from TradingView, fire webhooks and custom API triggers, or deploy fully autonomous AI trading agents that react to market conditions in real-time. The platform also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) integrations, putting cutting-edge AI-driven execution within reach of any trader. Katoshi's deep native integration with Hyperliquid means bots can tap directly into one of crypto's fastest and most liquid on-chain order books, accessing perpetuals across hundreds of markets with minimal slippage. Whether automating a simple RSI crossover strategy or running a multi-leg algorithmic portfolio, Katoshi provides reliable infrastructure to scale it. Built from the ground up for Hyperliquid's architecture, it has become the go-to automation layer for retail traders and institutional desks operating in the ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | HyperEVM | HyperCore |
| Category | Wallets & Account Abstraction | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Website | hlnames.xyz | katoshi.ai |
| @hlnames | @KatoshiAI | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | domainsidentitynamingENS-style | AIautomationtrading-agentsnon-custodial |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while Katoshi runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Hyperliquid Names is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Katoshi targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Unique Features
Hyperliquid Names is distinguished by: domains, identity, naming, ENS-style. Katoshi stands out with: AI, automation, trading-agents, non-custodial.
When to Use Each
Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...
- ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Need features like domains and identity
- ✓Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem
Choose Katoshi if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like AI and automation
- ✓Need: AI-powered trading automation engine built exclusively for Hyperliquid
Ecosystem Integration
Hyperliquid Names
Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
Katoshi
Katoshi operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Hyperliquid Names or Katoshi to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category