Hyperliquid Names vs KittenSwap

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.

KittenSwap

KittenSwap is a community-owned decentralized exchange (DEX) built on HyperEVM that implements the ve(3,3) tokenomics model, positioning itself as the liquidity coordination layer for the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Self-described as a "metadex," KittenSwap aims to be not just a trading venue but a protocol that directs liquidity across the HyperEVM ecosystem by incentivizing liquidity providers through gauge voting and token emissions. The project launched in December 2024 and competes primarily against HyperSwap for DEX dominance on Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible layer. How It Works KittenSwap's technical architecture is built on Algebra Integral, a modular AMM framework that separates an immutable Core contract from a customizable Plugin layer. Algebra Integral powers over 50 DEXes with more than $150 billion in cumulative trading volume, providing battle-tested infrastructure that KittenSwap builds its HyperEVM-specific features on top of. The framework enables concentrated liquidity (CL) pools—where liquidity providers specify price ranges for their capital rather than providing liquidity across the full price curve—dramatically improving capital efficiency compared to traditional constant-product AMMs. At the economic layer, KittenSwap implements the ve(3,3) model, a tokenomics design originally popularized by Velodrome on Optimism and Aerodrome on Base. The system works as follows: KITTEN is the protocol's native token, emitted as liquidity incentives. Users who wish to participate in governance and earn fees lock KITTEN tokens in exchange for veKITTEN (vote-escrowed KITTEN), with longer lock periods conferring proportionally more veKITTEN. veKITTEN holders vote on which liquidity pools receive KITTEN emissions during each weekly epoch. Protocols and liquidity providers who want emissions directed to their pools must either acquire veKITTEN themselves or incentivize existing veKITTEN holders with external bribes. In return, veKITTEN voters earn 100% of the trading fees generated by the pools they vote for during that epoch. This design creates a flywheel: protocols needing deep liquidity compete to attract veKITTEN votes by offering bribes, which incentivizes users to lock KITTEN for longer periods, reducing circulating supply and creating scarcity pressure, which increases the attractiveness of KITTEN as a yield-bearing asset. KittenSwap supports both stable AMM pools optimized for pegged assets and volatile AMM pools for general token pairs, in addition to concentrated liquidity positions. Key Features - ve(3,3) Governance and Incentives: veKITTEN staking aligns liquidity incentives with protocol governance, enabling token holders to direct emissions each weekly epoch and earn fees from the pools they vote for. - Algebra Integral Architecture: Modular AMM design with concentrated liquidity support and a plugin system for future feature expansion without compromising core contract security. - Dual Pool Types: Support for both stable and volatile liquidity pools, accommodating pegged-asset trading alongside general token pairs with different pricing curves. - Bribe Marketplace: Protocols can post external incentives to attract veKITTEN votes toward their liquidity pools, creating a market-driven liquidity allocation mechanism. - DEX Aggregator Integration: KittenSwap is integrated into HyperEVM DEX aggregators such as LiquidSwap, routing trades through its pools alongside HyperSwap and Laminar for best-price execution. Team and Backing KittenSwap presents as a community-owned project, consistent with its positioning as the community-owned metadex. The founding team has not been publicly identified by name, maintaining pseudonymity. The project launched via a community-focused model without a disclosed institutional venture funding round, relying instead on a Token Generation Event and community participation for initial capitalization. The Twitter account (@KittenswapHype) was created in December 2024, aligning with the protocol's launch period. Delphi Digital published research coverage on KittenSwap in May 2025, suggesting institutional attention from crypto research firms even if not direct investment. Traction and Metrics KittenSwap launched in December 2024 as HyperEVM was in its early growth phase. By late March 2025, the protocol had recorded approximately $4.28 million in TVL and $2.72 million in trading volume. As context, the broader HyperEVM ecosystem had grown to approximately $900 million in total TVL by May 2025, with weekly DEX volume approaching $1 billion across all protocols. KittenSwap's position within this growing market has been as a challenger to HyperSwap, the larger and more Uniswap v2/v3-aligned DEX on HyperEVM. The KITTEN token has a total supply of 1.34 billion tokens with approximately 348 million in circulation as of early reporting. Competitive Position HyperSwap is KittenSwap's primary direct competitor on HyperEVM, and the two represent different philosophical approaches to DEX design. HyperSwap is based on Uniswap v2 and v3 architecture—familiar, proven, and widely integrated. KittenSwap adopts the Velodrome/Aerodrome model—more complex ve(3,3) governance but designed to be the liquidity backbone for the entire ecosystem rather than just a trading venue. In the broader DeFi context, the ve(3,3) model has been most successful when deployed early in a new ecosystem—Velodrome on Optimism, Aerodrome on Base—as it becomes the default liquidity layer for protocols launching on that chain. KittenSwap is pursuing the same playbook on HyperEVM, but with the disadvantage that HyperSwap launched earlier and captured initial TVL. The competitive outcome between the Uniswap-style and ve(3,3)-style DEX will likely depend on whether protocols choose to use KittenSwap's bribe marketplace to incentivize their liquidity. If HyperEVM produces a diverse set of new tokens and protocols needing deep, incentivized liquidity—as Optimism and Base did—KittenSwap's model is well-suited. If liquidity remains concentrated in a few large pools, HyperSwap's simpler model may suffice. Hyperliquid Integration KittenSwap is natively deployed on HyperEVM, Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible execution environment. It trades on HyperEVM's blockspace using the chain's native gas token and is fully integrated with HyperEVM's asset universe, including HYPE and other Hyperliquid-native tokens. The protocol's concentrated liquidity pools and ve(3,3) emission mechanics operate entirely within the HyperEVM environment. As HyperEVM grows and more protocols deploy there, KittenSwap's bribe marketplace becomes more relevant, as each new protocol needs to bootstrap liquidity for its native token. Risks and Considerations The ve(3,3) model is more operationally complex than standard AMM DEXes, creating a steeper learning curve for users and a more fragile flywheel that depends on continuous protocol participation. If KITTEN token value declines significantly, the economics of vote-locking deteriorate and veKITTEN governance becomes less competitive, potentially accelerating liquidity migration to simpler venues. The community-owned positioning, while aligning with decentralization values, also means the project lacks identified leadership accountable for development roadmap execution. HyperSwap's earlier launch and Uniswap brand recognition pose sustained competitive pressure. Additionally, KittenSwap's success is correlated with whether HyperEVM achieves broad developer and user adoption, a macro risk factor beyond the protocol's control.

Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...

• ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
• ✓Need features like domains and identity
• ✓Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem

Choose KittenSwap if you...

• ✓Want a decentralized exchanges solution on HyperEVM
• ✓Need features like DEX and ve(3,3)
• ✓Need: ve(3,3) community-owned MetaDEX on HyperEVM — ~$32M TVL