Hyperliquid Names vs Panoptic
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction
Ecosystem PickQuick Take
Hyperliquid Names .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem on HyperEVM, while Panoptic Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Hyperliquid Names and Panoptic. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Hyperliquid Names
HyperEVM.hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem
hlnames.xyzPanoptic
Multi-LayerPerpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs
panoptic.xyzOverview
Hyperliquid Names
Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.
Visit websitePanoptic
Panoptic is a groundbreaking perpetual options protocol built on Uniswap v3-style liquidity positions, enabling the permissionless creation and trading of any-strike, any-expiry options on any EVM token pair without the need for a traditional order book, options clearing house, or centralized counterparty. It represents one of the most technically sophisticated options primitives in DeFi, redefining how on-chain options are structured and priced. The protocol core insight is that Uniswap v3 concentrated liquidity positions are structurally equivalent to short-options payoff profiles. By reinterpreting and tokenizing these LP positions as options contracts, Panoptic enables traders to buy and sell calls and puts permissionlessly on any Uniswap v3 pool. Options sellers provide liquidity and collect streaming fees continuously, while options buyers pay a streaming premium instead of an upfront cost, eliminating the need for expiry dates and simplifying options mechanics for DeFi users. Panoptic supports multi-leg options strategies including spreads, straddles, strangles, and condors, all composable and expressible within a single transaction. This brings institutional-grade options strategy construction to DeFi for the first time in a fully on-chain, non-custodial format. On HyperEVM, where Uniswap v3-compatible concentrated liquidity DEXes are deploying, Panoptic enables sophisticated options trading on Hyperliquid spot assets. Options traders can express views on BTC, ETH, HYPE, and other assets with defined risk profiles, hedging perpetual positions or speculating on volatility surfaces. This complementary options layer adds significant depth to Hyperliquid existing perpetuals infrastructure. The protocol fee structure is directly linked to Uniswap v3 pool fee tiers of 0.05%, 0.30%, and 1.00%, and all pricing is derived from on-chain LP data, making Panoptic fully oracle-free and resistant to price manipulation. Liquidations are handled through a force-exercise mechanism that incentivizes third parties to close at-risk positions without centralized liquidators. Panoptic is targeted at experienced DeFi traders, options market makers, and quant funds seeking to build options books on-chain. Its gas-efficient design, deep Uniswap v3 integration, and novel streaming premium model make it one of the most technically innovative derivatives protocols in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | HyperEVM | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Wallets & Account Abstraction | Decentralized Exchanges |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2025 | — |
| Website | hlnames.xyz | panoptic.xyz |
| @hlnames | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | domainsidentitynamingENS-style | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while Panoptic runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Hyperliquid Names is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Panoptic targets decentralized exchanges. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...
- ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Need features like domains and identity
- ✓Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem
Choose Panoptic if you...
- ✓Want a decentralized exchanges solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Perpetual options protocol built on concentrated liquidity AMMs
Ecosystem Integration
Hyperliquid Names
Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
Panoptic
Panoptic operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Hyperliquid Names or Panoptic to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category