PERP.WIKI

Hyperliquid Names vs Silo Finance

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Hyperliquid Names .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem on HyperEVM, while Silo Finance Isolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Hyperliquid Names and Silo Finance. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.

Visit website
Silo Finance logo

Silo Finance

Silo Finance is an isolated lending market protocol where each asset gets its own lending silo, ensuring that a compromise in one market cannot cascade to others. By pairing each asset with a bridge asset (ETH or stablecoins), Silo achieves risk isolation while maintaining capital efficiency for borrowers. This architecture is particularly valuable on HyperEVM where newer Hyperliquid spot tokens carry varying risk profiles. Silo v2 introduces permissionless market creation with configurable interest rate models and liquidation mechanisms, enabling any project to deploy a lending market for their token on Hyperliquid. The protocol's battle-tested security model and isolation-first design make it attractive for long-tail asset markets that larger monolithic protocols cannot safely support. Silo's architecture allows the Hyperliquid ecosystem to support lending for any HIP-1 token without threatening the security of other markets.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid NamesSilo Finance logoSilo Finance
LayerHyperEVMMulti-Layer
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionLending & Borrowing
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitehlnames.xyzsilo.finance
Twitter@hlnames
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
domainsidentitynamingENS-style

Score Comparison

Hyperliquid NamesSilo Finance
Open Source
Hyperliquid Names
Not public
Silo Finance
Not public
Verified
Hyperliquid Names
Unverified
Silo Finance
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Hyperliquid Names
4 tags
Silo Finance
0 tags
Maturity
Hyperliquid Names
Since 2025
Silo Finance
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid NamesSilo Finance logoSilo Finance
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while Silo Finance runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Hyperliquid Names is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Silo Finance targets lending & borrowing. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like domains and identity
  • Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem

Choose Silo Finance if you...

  • Want a lending & borrowing solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Isolated lending markets ensuring risk containment for any token on HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Silo Finance logo

Silo Finance

Silo Finance operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Hyperliquid Names or Silo Finance to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons