PERP.WIKI

Hyperliquid Names vs Solv Protocol

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction

Ecosystem Pick
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Hyperliquid Names .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem on HyperEVM, while Solv Protocol Bitcoin yield layer offering SolvBTC as productive BTC collateral on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Hyperliquid Names and Solv Protocol. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.

Visit website
Solv Protocol logo

Solv Protocol

Solv Protocol is a decentralized yield layer for Bitcoin, offering SolvBTC, a yield-bearing BTC wrapper that generates returns from institutional-grade Bitcoin strategies including options selling, delta-neutral lending, and algorithmic market-making. By wrapping BTC into SolvBTC, holders earn Bitcoin-denominated yield without selling their BTC exposure, enabling idle Bitcoin to work productively within DeFi ecosystems including HyperEVM. The protocol was founded in 2020 and has grown to become one of the largest Bitcoin yield infrastructure providers in DeFi, with billions in assets under management deployed across Ethereum, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Mantle, and other EVM-compatible chains. SolvBTC maintains a 1:1 BTC peg backed by on-chain reserves and institutional custodians, with Merkle proofs and audited smart contracts ensuring full transparency of underlying holdings. Solv yield strategies are powered by its Bitcoin Reserve ecosystem, which aggregates BTC collateral into a diversified set of revenue-generating strategies. These include options vaults selling covered calls and cash-secured puts on BTC, lending pools where BTC is deployed to institutional borrowers, and liquidity provision to market makers on centralized and decentralized venues. The result is a competitive annualized yield paid out in BTC, typically ranging from 5-15% APY depending on market conditions. For the Hyperliquid ecosystem, SolvBTC provides a critical piece of infrastructure enabling BTC holders to bring capital into HyperEVM DeFi without sacrificing Bitcoin exposure. As HyperEVM lending protocols, yield vaults, and trading infrastructure mature, SolvBTC serves as a productive yield-bearing BTC collateral asset deployable across Hyperliquid-native DeFi strategies. SolvBTC.BBN extends the yield stack further by incorporating Bitcoin staking through the Babylon protocol, adding additional yield from Bitcoin emerging role in the broader crypto ecosystem. Solv targets both retail BTC holders seeking passive yield without TradFi intermediaries, and institutional participants looking for on-chain, transparent BTC yield solutions with auditable strategies and non-custodial asset management.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeatureHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid NamesSolv Protocol logoSolv Protocol
LayerHyperEVMMulti-Layer
CategoryWallets & Account AbstractionRWA Perps
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitehlnames.xyzsolv.finance
Twitter@hlnames
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
domainsidentitynamingENS-style

Score Comparison

Hyperliquid NamesSolv Protocol
Open Source
Hyperliquid Names
Not public
Solv Protocol
Not public
Verified
Hyperliquid Names
Unverified
Solv Protocol
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Hyperliquid Names
4 tags
Solv Protocol
0 tags
Maturity
Hyperliquid Names
Since 2025
Solv Protocol
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeatureHyperliquid Names logoHyperliquid NamesSolv Protocol logoSolv Protocol
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while Solv Protocol runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Hyperliquid Names is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while Solv Protocol targets rwa perps. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...

  • Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like domains and identity
  • Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem

Choose Solv Protocol if you...

  • Want a rwa perps solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Bitcoin yield layer offering SolvBTC as productive BTC collateral on HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Hyperliquid Names logo

Hyperliquid Names

Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Solv Protocol logo

Solv Protocol

Solv Protocol operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Hyperliquid Names or Solv Protocol to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons