Hyperliquid Names vs The Graph
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Wallets & Account Abstraction
Ecosystem PickQuick Take
Hyperliquid Names .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem on HyperEVM, while The Graph Decentralized indexing protocol for building GraphQL APIs from HyperEVM smart contracts on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Hyperliquid Names and The Graph. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Hyperliquid Names
HyperEVM.hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem
hlnames.xyzThe Graph
Multi-LayerDecentralized indexing protocol for building GraphQL APIs from HyperEVM smart contracts
thegraph.comOverview
Hyperliquid Names
Hyperliquid Names is an on-chain domain naming service for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling users to register human-readable .hl domains that map to wallet addresses and on-chain identities. Similar to ENS on Ethereum, Hyperliquid Names solves a fundamental UX problem: cryptographic wallet addresses are long, error-prone hex strings that are nearly impossible to remember or share reliably. With a .hl domain, you can send assets to alice.hl instead of a 42-character address — dramatically improving usability and reducing the risk of costly transfer errors. Domains are registered on-chain, ensuring ownership is trustless and censorship-resistant — no central authority can revoke your name. Beyond simple address resolution, .hl domains can store metadata such as social profiles, website links, and avatar images, serving as a portable on-chain identity layer across Hyperliquid applications. As the ecosystem expands with wallets, DEXs, trading interfaces, and social apps, a unified naming layer becomes essential infrastructure for user experience. Early adopters can claim short premium names before they become scarce, and a secondary market for valuable .hl domains is already forming among ecosystem participants.
Visit websiteThe Graph
The Graph is the decentralized indexing protocol for blockchain data, enabling HyperEVM developers to build and deploy Subgraphs—open APIs that index, transform, and serve on-chain data via GraphQL. Rather than building custom indexing infrastructure, HyperEVM protocol teams can define their data schema and indexing logic in a Subgraph manifest, and The Graph's decentralized network of Indexers handles the computation and data serving. This dramatically accelerates frontend development for Hyperliquid DeFi dApps that need historical and real-time on-chain data without running centralized backend infrastructure. Subgraph data is trustless and cryptographically verifiable, making it appropriate for decentralized applications that want to maintain censorship-resistance. The Graph's GRT token incentivizes high-quality, reliable data indexing, ensuring HyperEVM Subgraphs remain continuously available and accurate for users and developers building on Hyperliquid's smart contract ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer | HyperEVM | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Wallets & Account Abstraction | Data APIs |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2025 | — |
| Website | hlnames.xyz | thegraph.com |
| @hlnames | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | domainsidentitynamingENS-style | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1), while The Graph runs on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Hyperliquid Names is focused on wallets & account abstraction, while The Graph targets data apis. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Hyperliquid Names if you...
- ✓Want a wallets & account abstraction solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Need features like domains and identity
- ✓Need: .hl domain names for the Hyperliquid ecosystem
Choose The Graph if you...
- ✓Want a data apis solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Decentralized indexing protocol for building GraphQL APIs from HyperEVM smart contracts
Ecosystem Integration
Hyperliquid Names
Hyperliquid Names operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
The Graph
The Graph operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Hyperliquid Names or The Graph to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category